Crucial M4 SSD 256GB review
With an updated Marvell memory controller on-board, Crucial’s M4 looks to be the fastest SSD the company has ever produced. Tom Morgan takes a look to see how it compares to the competition.

Although it's not radically different from last year’s model, the M4 is significantly faster than the disk it replaces. Intel’s 510 Series SSDs are still dominant in our performance benchmarks, but both have the potential to be blown away by SandForce. Stick with Intel if you need the best performance now, or wait to see what other manufacturers can squeeze from their memory controllers in the next month or two.
If you were in the market for an SSD last year, there's a good chance you would have considered a Crucial RealSSD C300; it produced incredibly fast transfer rates thanks to a competent Marvell memory controller and thrashed most of the competition with its fast SATA III connection. The company lost ground to other manufacturers that used the impressively fast SandForce controller, but is hoping to reverse this trend with the M4.
Our file transfer tests proved that the updated memory controller has made a big difference.
The M4 includes some much-needed optimisations that should help boost performance. The all-important memory controller might be the same one that Intel uses in its 510-series SSDs, but a newer revision and custom firmware should set the two disks apart. The real change has been the shift to 25nm NAND flash memory. This should not only bring a slight performance boost, but lower manufacturing costs too which will helpfully lead to lower prices.
We weren't expecting a huge performance gap between the older C300 and newer M4, but our file transfer tests proved that the updated memory controller has made a big difference. In our SATA III-equipped test system, the M4 managed an impressive 252.8MB/s write and huge 319MB/s read when handling large files, which is significantly faster than its predecessor. Small file writes were equally fast at 171.9MB/s, but as we've come to expect from SSDs the small file read test was a struggle. A low 48.3MB/s score dragged down the overall result, but performance was still significantly better than the equivalent C300. In everyday use, we could load Windows in 13 seconds, a whole 43 seconds faster than we could using a mechanical hard disk.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
-
Salesforce says ‘Microsoft’s anticompetitive tying of Teams' harmed business in triumphant response to EU concessions agreement
News Microsoft has agreed to make versions of its Office solutions suite available without Teams – and at a reduced price
By Ross Kelly Published
-
Healthcare organizations report rampant email security failures – and Microsoft 365 is often the weakest link
News IT leaders say they're drowning in security alerts and missing real threats, thanks to limited resources, expanding attack surfaces, and weak security strategies
By Emma Woollacott Published
-
Is the honeymoon period over for Microsoft and OpenAI? Strained relations and deals with competitors spell trouble for the partnership that transformed the AI industry
Analysis Microsoft and OpenAI are slowly drifting apart as both forge closer ties with respective rivals and reevaluate their long-running partnership.
By Ross Kelly Published