Head to Head: Parallels Desktop 6 vs VMware Fusion 3

We pit the two leading Mac virtualisation programs against each other to see which is best for running Windows on your shiny Apple computer.

PERFORMANCE

Windows on a VM will never be as fast as when it's running directly on the hardware via Boot Camp. For the fastest possible Windows applications performance, you'll always have to reboot and use Boot Camp. We expected that Parallels and Fusion would perform similarly in our Windows benchmarks, but there was a noticeable difference in a couple of our tests.

We tested both virtualisation programs with 64-bit Windows 7 Ultimate running a 13in MacBook Pro with 4GB of RAM, a Core 2 Duo P8600 processor, a 750GB 5,400rpm hard disk and an Nvidia GeForce 320M integrated graphics chip. The VMs in both Parallels and Fusion were assigned two processor cores, 2GB of RAM and 256MB of video memory.

As a reference, the same MacBook Pro, but with just 2GB of RAM installed to match the VM configurations, managed the following benchmark scores:

Image editing100 points

Video encoding66 points

Multiple applications67 points

Overall score72 points

3D graphics test12 frames per second.

Both virtualisation programs can save a VM's state instead of shutting it down. Resuming from a saved state is quicker than booting, so we tested how quickly each program could resume from a saved state. Our MacBook Pro resumed from hibernation, the closest equivalent to resuming from a saved state, in 26 seconds.

Parallels

Parallels Desktop 6 managed the following benchmark scores:

Image editing71 points

Video encoding59 points

Multiple applications43 points

Overall score56 points

3D graphics test5 frames per second

Resume46 seconds

VMWare

VMWare Fusion 3 managed the following benchmark scores:

Image editing63 points

Video encoding53 points

Multiple applications41 points

Overall score51 points

3D graphics test3.4 frames per second

Resume25 seconds

Winner: Parallels, but only just. Parallels was faster than Fusion in our image editing and 3D graphics tests, while Fusion was much faster at resuming from a saved state. The two were otherwise evenly matched.

Parallels has options allowing you to tweak the VM for faster MacOS or Windows performance, as well as for either faster performance or longer battery life which MacBook owners will appreciate. It would take trial and error to find the right balance with these extra settings, but they're still useful options that Fusion lacks, especially since both programs can feel sluggish on a MacBook when running off battery power.

Featured Resources

Seven steps to connect and empower your frontline workers

How business leaders can improve communication with a secure platform

Free download

Create what’s next

The future of collaboration and productivity

Free Download

Leveraging the cloud without relinquishing control

Your data. Their cloud.

Free download

Re-architecting for nonstop innovation

Unlocking productivity, scalability, and lower costs for cloud natives

Free Download

Recommended

Apple sues NSO Group over Pegasus attacks on its customers
spyware

Apple sues NSO Group over Pegasus attacks on its customers

24 Nov 2021
Apple launches self-repair scheme for iPhones and Macs
Business strategy

Apple launches self-repair scheme for iPhones and Macs

18 Nov 2021
Apple unveils Business Essentials suite for small businesses
business management

Apple unveils Business Essentials suite for small businesses

11 Nov 2021
Judge denies Apple appeal in Epic ruling
iOS

Judge denies Apple appeal in Epic ruling

10 Nov 2021

Most Popular

How to speed up Microsoft's Windows 11
Microsoft Windows

How to speed up Microsoft's Windows 11

9 Nov 2021
Nike to take customers into the metaverse with 'NIKELAND'
virtualisation

Nike to take customers into the metaverse with 'NIKELAND'

19 Nov 2021
Best MDM solutions 2020
mobile device management (MDM)

Best MDM solutions 2020

12 Nov 2021