IT Pro is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more

Apple appeals Epic ruling in attempt to delay App Store changes

The one ruling in Epic's favour found Apple in violation of the state of California’s anti-steering laws

Apple has filed a notice of appeal of the ruling in its trial against Epic in a bid to delay App Store payment changes that would take effect starting December.

The tech giant is appealing the court ruling of the antitrust case against Epic Games which was announced last month and saw Apple win nine of the ten claims Epic had brought against it.

However, the one claim that ruled in favour of Epic saw the judge find that Apple violated the state of California’s anti-steering laws and illegally prevented consumers from exercising their choice of which payment system to use for in-app purchases. 

Therefore, the judge ruled that, from December 2021, Apple would have to allow developers to link to non-App Store payment systems.

Although Apple first described the ruling as a “resounding victory”, it’s now appealing and has requested that the court pause the ordered implementation of the new policy.

The tech giant is arguing that allowing developers to link external payment systems could put consumers at risk of financial scams.

Although the links could be subject to moderation, Apple stated that “there is nothing stopping a developer from changing the landing point for that link or altering the content of the destination webpage”. 

Related Resource

Service mesh or API management?

Deploy a comprehensive service architecture for your organisation

Animated people moving around boxes on a giant laptop screen in a cloudFree download

“Additionally, Apple currently has no ability to determine whether a user who clicks on an external link actually received the products or features she paid for. Apple already receives hundreds of thousands of reports each day from users, and allowing links to external payment options would only increase this burden,” reads the court document submitted by the tech giant.

Apple also argued that Epic “offered no evidence that it was harmed by the anti-steering provisions” and has “no standing to enforce the injunction” because its apps remain banned from the App Store. On 22 September, Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said that “Apple informed Epic that Fortnite will be blacklisted from the Apple ecosystem until the exhaustion of all court appeals, which could be as long as a 5-year process”.

Epic had already appealed the court ruling, filing a request two days after the verdict was announced on 10 September. The continuation of the legal battle could see both companies lose billions of dollars in legal fees, with further uncertainty for app developers. 

Featured Resources

The state of Salesforce: Future of business

Three articles that look forward into the changing state of Salesforce and the future of business

Free Download

The mighty struggle to migrate SAP to the cloud may be over

A simplified and unified approach to delivering Enterprise Transformation in the cloud

Free Download

The business value of the transformative mainframe

Modernising on the mainframe

Free Download

The Total Economic Impact™ Of IBM FlashSystem

Cost savings and business benefits enabled by FlashSystem

Free Download

Most Popular

Why convenience is the biggest threat to your security
Sponsored

Why convenience is the biggest threat to your security

8 Aug 2022
How to boot Windows 11 in Safe Mode
Microsoft Windows

How to boot Windows 11 in Safe Mode

29 Jul 2022
Microsoft successfully tests emission-free hydrogen fuel cell system for data centres
data centres

Microsoft successfully tests emission-free hydrogen fuel cell system for data centres

29 Jul 2022