UK Police woefully unequipped to handle data
Only one in 17 police forces tested by the ICO have been found to adequately handle people’s data
The Information Commissioner's Office has released audit results showing how only one police force in the UK secured top marks for data protection.
The watchdog carried out the tests between April 2013 and April 2014, focusing on 17 forces throughout the UK. Forces were tested on their adherence to the Data Protection Act, staff training and awareness, data sharing and security.
Only one (unnamed) police force emerged from the audit with a "high assurance" rating meaning that little to no action is required to shore up its data protection policies. Ten of the forces tested were given a "reasonable assurance" classification, meaning that they need "some" improvement to their security arrangements.
On the classification below, "limited assurance", were six forces, meaning that they need to improve their services in the future to better fall in line with the Data Protection Act's regulations.
No forces in the UK were given the lowest rating overall: "very limited assurance". Two police forces did, however, record this rating in two of their subcategories, namely records management and data sharing.
The audit covered 17 of the 43 forces in the country, so is by no means representative. Despite this, it still shows worrying signs of the unpreparedness of UK police in data protection and handling.
"Clearly police forces handle sensitive personal data, and we all want to have confidence that that information is being kept in line with the law," said an ICO spokesperson.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
"Our findings suggest that tends to be the case, with two thirds of the forces needing just a few improvements in the areas we audited.
"But there's no room for complacency. The report contains a list of areas for improvement, and all forces would do well to read it."
-
Trump's AI executive order could leave US in a 'regulatory vacuum'News Citing a "patchwork of 50 different regulatory regimes" and "ideological bias", President Trump wants rules to be set at a federal level
-
TPUs: Google's home advantageITPro Podcast How does TPU v7 stack up against Nvidia's latest chips – and can Google scale AI using only its own supply?
-
LastPass hit with ICO fine after 2022 data breach exposed 1.6 million users – here’s how the incident unfoldedNews The impact of the LastPass breach was felt by customers as late as December 2024
-
23andMe 'failed to take basic steps' to safeguard customer dataNews The ICO has strong criticism for the way the genetic testing company responded to a 2023 breach.
-
AI recruitment tools are still a privacy nightmare – here's how the ICO plans to crack down on misuseNews The ICO has issued guidance for recruiters and AI developers after finding that many are mishandling data
-
“You must do better”: Information Commissioner John Edwards calls on firms to beef up support for data breach victimsNews Companies need to treat victims with swift, practical action, according to the ICO
-
LinkedIn backtracks on AI training rules after user backlashNews UK-based LinkedIn users will now get the same protections as those elsewhere in Europe
-
UK's data protection watchdog deepens cooperation with National Crime AgencyNews The two bodies want to improve the support given to organizations experiencing cyber attacks and ransomware recovery
-
ICO slams Electoral Commission over security failuresNews The Electoral Commission has been reprimanded for poor security practices, including a failure to install security updates and weak password policies
-
Disgruntled ex-employees are using ‘weaponized’ data subject access requests to pester firmsNews Some disgruntled staff are using DSARs as a means to pressure former employers into a financial settlement