Five of the major ISPs in the US have begun a 'Six Strikes' policy against users they deem have committed copyright infringement.
The system is the brainchild of the Center for Copyright Information (CCI). This umbrella organisation comprises of five of the US's biggest ISPs - AT&T, Cablevision, Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Verizon as well as the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA).
The system works by serving suspected copyright infringers warnings. After six such warnings, ISPs will limit but not cut off a suspect's internet access.
"Our content partners will begin sending notices of alleged peer-to-peer copyright infringement to ISPs, and the ISPs will begin forwarding those notices in the form of copyright alerts to consumers," CCI's executive director Jill Lesser said in a blog post.
"Most consumers will never receive alerts under the program. Consumers whose accounts have been used to share copyrighted content over P2P networks illegally (or without authority) will receive alerts that are meant to educate rather than punish, and direct them to legal alternatives," she added.
However, civil rights groups have branded the scheme tantamount to ISPs acting as "judge, jury and executioner".
"These mega-corporations now claim the authority to undermine your Internet access - and want to serve as judge, jury, and executioner," said activist organisation Demand Progress. "Tell them to back off - or that you'll start looking for other places to bring your business."
Other organisations have raised concerns about the scheme. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) said such a scheme would undermine the open Wi-Fi movement, " even though open wireless is widely recognized to be tremendously beneficial to the public."
It said an independent body should be in charge of vetting the process.
In the UK, Ofcom's draft code would see users with three strikes within 12 months have anonymous information collected about the which would then be sent to copyright holders. These holders could then seek a court order to find out the identities of the suspected infringer.
The policy had been due to come into force March next year, but was delayed by a House of Lords committee that questioned whether the code, as part of the Digital Economy Act, compiled with Treasury rules.
-
What is polymorphic malware?Explainer Polymorphic malware constantly changes its code to avoid detection, making it a top cybersecurity threat that demands advanced, behavior-based defenses
-
Outgoing Kaseya CEO teases "this is just the beginning" for the companyOpinion We spoke to Fred Voccola who remains a key figurehead at the firm as it enters its next chapter...
-
New Ofcom guidelines show it’s getting tougher on big techNews New Ofcom guidance outlining its plans for the Online Safety Act show the regulator is toughening up on big tech.
-
Ofcom’s draft guidelines on illegal online content set stringent rules for big techNews The codes of practice gives an insight into what the Online Safety Act will mean in practice
-
UK gov urged to ease "tremendous" and 'unfair' costs placed on mobile network operatorsNews Annual licence fees, Huawei removal costs, and social media network usage were all highlighted as detrimental to telco success
-
UK regulator to investigate Amazon, Microsoft, Google cloud services competitionNews The regulator is hoping to publish a final report, including its concerns or proposed recommendations, within 12 months
-
Truss seeks last-ditch SoftBank meeting over Arm IPONews Gov said to want a dual New York-London listing, at the very least
-
MI5 and FBI warn businesses over mass Chinese IP theftNews The security services urged organisations to consolidate security practices and approach Chinese business relationships with caution
-
Internet providers look to ease cost of living crisis with cheaper broadbandNews Social tariffs could get slashed to help poorest in society
-
IBM sues LzLabs for alleged patent infringementNews The Swiss-based company is also alleged to have swindled IBM's trade secrets to reap profits
