Twitter investigates possibility that DMs were accessed during Bitcoin hack
Twitter maintains the attack was the result of 'social engineering', although reports suggest an employee may have been bribed
Twitter is investigating whether hackers gained access to the direct messages belonging to accounts of dozens of high-profile individuals following Wednesday’s hack.
The company has confirmed that approximately 130 accounts were targeted by attackers during the incident, including a handful of instances where hackers were able to send tweets.
Despite being able to access accounts to the degree where sending tweets was possible, Twitter said there’s currently no evidence that attackers accessed user passwords, so resetting these is not considered a necessary measure at this stage.
Although Twitter described the infiltration as a “social engineering attack”, the company is also investigating the possibility that an employee was bribed, according to the New York Times.
The company also hasn’t ruled out whether private data like direct messages had been accessed, although the extent to which the hackers gained access to a handful of the 130 compromised accounts suggests this is entirely possible.
“We’re working with impacted account owners and will continue to do so over the next several days,” Twitter said. “We are continuing to assess whether non-public data related to these accounts was compromised, and will provide updates if we determine that occurred.”
The option to download data from your Twitter account has been switched off during the ongoing investigation. The company also said it is taking “aggressive steps” to secure its systems.
This story has been updated to reflect new information. The original story is published below
Hackers targeted Twitter employees with access to company tools and internal systems in a “co-ordinated social engineering attack” to seize control of high profile accounts and launch a Bitcoin scam.
Several major account holders began posting suspicious messages last night on a co-ordinated basis, including Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Barack Obama, and Jeff Bezos, which between them have hundreds of millions of followers.
These messages described a scheme whereby all Bitcoin donated to a particular wallet, the same in each fraudulent tweet, would be sent back doubled, in light of that individual deciding to “give back”.
Having tracked the Bitcoin wallet, the hackers have, at the time of writing managed to solicit 376 fraudulent donations to the tune of 12.87 Bitcoin, equivalent to approximately £93,000.
Twitter confirmed at 10:45PM BST that it was aware of a security incident, and would investigate this urgently. The company subsequently placed heavy restrictions on many account holders, especially those who are verified, preventing them from tweeting or resetting their passwords, alongside “some other account functionalities”.
Those accounts that were compromised, having posted the fraudulent message, were also temporarily blocked entirely. These restrictions have been gradually lifted, with a handful of users only regaining the capacity to tweet as normal this morning.
Twitter soon confirmed in the early hours of the morning it had detected what it believed to be a coordinated social engineering attack by people who successfully targeted some of its employees with access to internal systems and tools.
“We know they used this access to take control of many highly-visible (including verified) accounts and Tweet on their behalf,” the company said. “We’re looking into what other malicious activity they may have conducted or information they may have accessed and will share more here as we have it.
“We also limited functionality for a much larger group of accounts, like all verified accounts (even those with no evidence of being compromised), while we continue to fully investigate this. This was disruptive, but it was an important step to reduce risk. Most functionality has been restored but we may take further actions and will update you if we do.”
The company has confirmed it’s taken “significant steps” to limit access to internal systems and tools during its investigation, although these haven’t been outlined in any great detail.
It also appears employees targeted in the social engineering attack had direct access to users' accounts. For example, fraudulent Bitcoin tweets were often 'pinned', which could normally only be performed by logging into accounts.
Alarmingly, some of those involved in the hack told Motherboard they actually paid a Twitter employee to grant them access to their own account, with the accounts taken over using an internal Twitter tool. Some users have posted screenshots of the tool in question, and have been circulating these images online.
The incident is certainly one of the company’s biggest security breaches in history and follows a string of smaller-scale hacks over the previous few months and years.
Only last month Twitter alerted business customers after flagging a data breach, suggesting their personal details may have been compromised due to an issue with the way Twitter cached data on web browsers. The information of those who were signed up to the company’s advertising or analytics platform may have been accessed by third-parties as a result of the glitch.
This follows an incident in August 2019 in which Twitter found an issue with its privacy settings, meaning musers may have inadvertently been sharing data with third-parties. This, however, was more of a privacy violation than an out-and-out security breach.
The largest breach to date, barring this week’s incident, however, arose in 2018 after a bug allowed company staff to view account passwords in an unencrypted form. The company asked 330 million users, as a result, to change their passwords urgently for fear of their accounts being compromised.
Choosing a collaboration platform
Eight questions every IT leader should askDownload now
Performance benchmark: PostgreSQL/ MongoDB
Helping developers choose a databaseDownload now
Customer service vs. customer experience
Three-step guide to modern customer experienceDownload now
Taking a proactive approach to cyber security
A complete guide to penetration testingDownload now