Silicon Valley hiring practices lawsuit gets class action status
Major companies accused of colluding to push down wages.

A US judge accorded class action status to a lawsuit that alleges broad conspiracy among major Silicon Valley companies to suppress employee compensation by not poaching each other's employees, a court filing showed.
By winning the class certification, the plaintiffs would have more leverage to extract larger financial settlements than if they were to sue individually.
In 2011, five software engineers sued Adobe Systems, Intel, Apple and Google among others over their hiring practices, alleging that the Silicon Valley companies entered into an "overarching conspiracy" to suppress employee compensation to artificially low levels.
The defendants were accused of violating the Sherman Act and Clayton Act antitrust laws by conspiring to eliminate competition for labour, depriving workers of job mobility and hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation.
The case has been closely watched in the Silicon Valley, and much of it has been built on email exchanges between top executives, including the late Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs and former Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt.
Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California, in a ruling made available on Thursday, also certified the proposed class of technical employees, which includes software and hardware engineers, component designers, application developers, among others.
The plaintiffs believe this proposed class includes more than 50,000 people, according to the filing.
Get the ITPro daily newsletter
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
In their original complaint, the plaintiffs sought certification of an "All Employee" class, which included every salaried employee throughout the United States who worked for the defendant companies between 2005 and 2009, estimated to be more than 100,000.
The plaintiffs limited their class action group after Judge Koh in April said they have yet to show enough in common among the proposed class members to allow them to sue together.
The case is In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 11-02509, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.
ITPro is a global business technology website providing the latest news, analysis, and business insight for IT decision-makers. Whether it's cyber security, cloud computing, IT infrastructure, or business strategy, we aim to equip leaders with the data they need to make informed IT investments.
For regular updates delivered to your inbox and social feeds, be sure to sign up to our daily newsletter and follow on us LinkedIn and Twitter.
-
A decade-long ban on AI laws is a “terrible idea” for everyone but big tech, critics claim
News A proposed decade-long ban on US states implementing AI laws is a "terrible idea" that highlights the scale of big tech lobbying, according to critics.
-
‘Big three’ cloud providers face business overhaul to continue EU operations
News New security labeling rules for non-EU cloud providers have been a contentious topic in recent weeks
-
Biden rescinds Trump's anti-Section 230 executive order
News Trump order fought social media platform's censorship of political tweets
-
Google secretly gamed its own ad system, lawsuit claims
News Secretive “Project Bernanke” allegedly gave the search giant an unfair advantage
-
What is flexible working?
News Flexible working is all the rage, but what is it - and can anyone do it?
-
Jawbone sues Fitbit for third time in two months
News Fitness band manufacturer files lawsuit against competitor for breach of patent
-
Online trolls threatened with ASBO-style social media bans
News MPs are campaigning for tougher rules for those who bully others online
-
Apple-owned Beats sued by former investor Monster
News Monster's CEO claims he was misled about plans to sell company to Apple, and lost money as a result