Meta used a ‘constellation of internal artificial intelligence systems’ to target workers in recent layoffs, lawsuit claims – keystroke monitoring data, AI token usage, and performance ratings allegedly decided employee fates
Former Meta employees allege that an AI system used to select people for layoffs was biased
A group of current and former Meta employees is suing the company, claiming that it used AI to target those on medical or family leave for layoffs.
In May, Meta announced it was cutting around 8,000 staff, representing roughly 10% of its workforce. According to the lawsuit, the tech giant used AI systems to identify those set for redundancy.
These systems allegedly took into account keystroke monitoring data, AI token usage
“Meta did not assemble the termination list through the considered judgment of managers who knew the work,” court filings state.
“Instead, Meta used a constellation of internal artificial intelligence systems — including a system referred to internally as ‘Metamate,’ employee-trained ‘second-brain’ agents, keystroke- and activity-monitoring data, AI-token-usage dashboards, and algorithmically assisted performance ranking and calibration — to score, rank and select employees for inclusion on the list.”
Complainants allege this put employees on protected medical or family leave, or those whose output was reduced by a disability, at a disadvantage by penalizing them with reduced performance scores.
"The result was that employees who took protected leaves were disproportionately selected for layoff, based on scoring that not only failed to account for their protected leaves, but in effect penalized the employees for exercising their legal rights to these leaves."
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2026 report - the leading resource for IT decision-maker insight on priorities and investment areas in AI, security and more.
In one example, an employee was laid off while on approved pre-birth pregnancy leave – the day before her waters broke, and just two days before she gave birth.
In another, a manager’s own performance review noted that his demotion followed his return from medical leave; he was put on the list sixteen days into a second medical leave.
The 26 plaintiffs claim that Meta has violated state-protected leave laws, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
They're calling for a preliminary court ruling that would stop Meta from finalizing the layoffs while they pursue their claims.
“Once these separations are final, the harms are irreversible: employer-subsidized health coverage lost during pregnancy, postpartum recovery, and active medical treatment; time-bound leave rights extinguished; unvested equity forfeited; and immigration consequences triggered,” they said.
Plaintiffs are also seeking financial compensation that could include reinstatement, back pay, lost equity, benefits, and other damages.
AI in HR is a delicate balancing act
The use of AI systems in HR and recruitment has been a long-running point of contention, particularly with regard to the potential for bias or discrimination.
Workday, for example, is facing a class-action lawsuit amidst claims its AI software discriminated against job applicants. As ITPro reported in June, the company hit back at the claims, with a spokesperson insisting its AI solutions “don’t make hiring decisions”.
Ilia Kolochenko, founder of cybersecurity company ImmuniWeb and a lawyer practising in cybersecurity and data protection, noted that over-regulation of the use of AI in HR could cause long-term harm.
"With the current trend to restrict or even entirely ban AI in HR decision-making processes, most organizations will either conceal the use of AI or shift back to non-AI systems especially in those jurisdictions that have no GDPR-like protection against automated decision-making on human subjects," he said.
"Compared to AI-powered HR systems, their non-AI homologues are quite primitive, fail to consider the relevant context and often provide incorrect metrics or data,” Kolochenko added.
“For instance, a poor performance of a delivery truck driver will not be correlated with extreme summer heat or winter snowfalls, sudden family loss or simply a technical issue with the vehicle. Eventually, innocent persons are wrongly punished.”
ITPro approached Meta for comment, but did not receive a response by time of publication.
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Follow ITPro on Google News and add us as a preferred source to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, views, and reviews.
You can also follow ITPro on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and BlueSky.
Emma Woollacott is a freelance journalist writing for publications including the BBC, Private Eye, Forbes, Raconteur and specialist technology titles.
-
EU sues over delays to border control biometricsNews EU-LISA is suing IBM, Leonardo, and Atos over Entry/Exit System delays
-
UK military 'hunt forces' look to track down cyber criminals in real worldNews The aim is to stop cyber attacks in their early stages before they escalate into large-scale attacks
-
‘This is a massive change’: PagerDuty wants to supercharge incident response with a new SRE agent and command centerNews The new Paige agent from PagerDuty will act as a digital assistant for teams battling incidents
-
Replacing workers with AI? You may come to regret it: Gartner warns 30% of employees who’ve been laid off because of the technology will be rehired by 2029 – and at a far higher cost to the businessNews New research from Gartner suggests that poor workforce planning means many companies will up rehiring staff
-
‘Organizations will not generate cost savings from AI at this point’: Just 3% of companies have recorded cost savings with AI – but that isn’t stopping them from investing moreNews More than one-third of AI projects have run over budget, but business leaders are still bullish on investment
-
Microsoft’s ‘voluntary exit’ offer explained: Why is the company offering staff buyouts and which staff are eligible?News The tech giant expects fewer than 30% to take up the offer, but the move shows changes are afoot at Microsoft
-
A big tech taskforce has unveiled a blueprint for UK AI leadership – but time for action is running outNews Success depends on deeper collaboration between government, industry, local leaders and communities
-
Microsoft says AI is causing a workforce rupture among British businesses – leaders are backing the technology, but workers still aren’t soldNews New Microsoft research shows a huge disconnect between leadership and employees when it comes to confidence in the UK leading in AI
-
ISACA CEO says AI compliance will be like 'SOX on steroids'News Businesses will need to do far more work in far less time to meet stringent regulations
-
‘The most useful thing a leader can do right now is admit the plan is unfinished’: Workers are being told to use AI, but not why to use it – here’s why that mattersNews A Culture Amp survey shows workers are eager for AI tools, but they'd like to know the business goal of the technology