Replacing workers with AI? You may come to regret it: Gartner warns 30% of employees who’ve been laid off because of the technology will be rehired by 2029 – and at a far higher cost to the business
New research from Gartner suggests that poor workforce planning means many companies will up rehiring staff
Organizations that have rushed to replace workers with AI may end up regretting that decision – and will be forced to re-hire staff at a higher cost.
That’s according to new research from Gartner, which found kneejerk decisions to replace staff with AI are due to a lack of effective workforce planning.
Indeed, only 19% of firms said they have practices in place to help leaders understand how work is changing, assessing AI’s impact, and aligning talent strategies with business goals.
As a result, Gartner said that by 2029 around 30% of employees who were terminated and replaced by AI will be rehired, but typically at a greater cost to the enterprise.
“Many organizations are making AI and workforce decisions in the wrong order,” said Caitlyn McDonough, vice president analyst in the Gartner HR practice.
“They decide how many people to let go before they understand what it will take to get work done. The goal should be to understand what work matters most to the strategy, how that work is changing, and the right mix of people and technology needed to deliver business outcomes.”
Ditch the ‘bottom up’ workforce approach
Rather than 'bottom up' planning, where leaders consider today’s jobs, skills, and headcount and assess how AI could change them, organizations should start by considering the enterprise strategy first, then aligning workforce decisions to the work required to achieve strategic goals.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2026 report - the leading resource for IT decision-maker insight on priorities and investment areas in AI, security and more.
They should start by identifying the workforce capabilities most critical to executing business strategy, and then forecast future work demand and capacity requirements.
Next, they should assess the future workforce supply, including both human and AI-enabled capacity, quantify workforce gaps and evaluate potential solutions based on cost, risk and speed, and establish governance processes to prioritize and fund workforce investments.
“To prepare for an AI-driven future, leaders should stop planning for the workforce they have and start planning for the workforce their strategy requires,” said McDonough.
“When organizations shift the focus from jobs to work and work demand, they avoid costly workforce missteps and allocate resources more effectively.”
The grass isn’t always greener
The report echoes research from Forrester this time last year, which found that 55% of companies that cut staff in favor of automation ended up regretting the move. That study came just months after a similar report revealed more than a third of UK business leaders regretted cutting staff in favor of AI.
Crucially, however, Forrester noted that rehiring doesn’t always involve bringing back laid off staff. Companies are increasingly offshoring jobs to avoid rehiring at higher rates.
Some organizations have admitted as much. This summer, for example, Ford reportedly started rehiring hundreds of experienced human engineers to work on quality issues that AI simply couldn’t address.
Meanwhile, after replacing more than 40 customer service staff with an AI chatbot, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia found that it simply wasn't up to the task and reversed the cuts.
AI-related layoffs have been a recurring talking point over the past two years, with companies attributing workforce cuts to advances in the technology and associated cost savings.
These bold claims are often a cover though, according to a study by Oxford Economics.
As ITPro reported earlier this year, a research paper suggested that firms are using AI as an excuse to cover for weak demand, poor financial performance, or excessive hiring.
"Some firms are trying to dress up layoffs as a good news story rather than bad news, such as past over-hiring," researchers said.
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Follow ITPro on Google News and add us as a preferred source to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, views, and reviews.
You can also follow ITPro on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and BlueSky.
Emma Woollacott is a freelance journalist writing for publications including the BBC, Private Eye, Forbes, Raconteur and specialist technology titles.
-
The Binance hack explainedNews Initial reports that a single compromised laptop was the cause of the Binance hack have been debunked by the crypto exchange firm
-
Lakeside Software taps Mark Benson to lead EMEA channel strategyNews The appointment comes as the digital employee experience (DEX) vendor looks to expand its partner ecosystem around the SysTrack platform
-
Microsoft’s ‘voluntary exit’ offer explained: Why is the company offering staff buyouts and which staff are eligible?News The tech giant expects fewer than 30% to take up the offer, but the move shows changes are afoot at Microsoft
-
Meta used a ‘constellation of internal artificial intelligence systems’ to target workers in recent layoffs, lawsuit claims – keystroke monitoring data, AI token usage, and performance ratings allegedly decided employee fatesNews Former Meta employees allege that an AI system used to select people for layoffs was biased
-
‘Today’s actions are not a cost-cutting exercise’: Cloudflare is cutting 1,100 jobs as internal AI usage surges 600%News The layoffs at Cloudflare come amid a 600% increase in internal AI usage
-
Enterprises keep cutting staff for AI — and they keep regretting itNews Gartner research shows many companies are reducing headcount due to AI, but it’s not all it’s cut out to be
-
Business leaders are using AI as a “license to reduce headcount” – new Morgan Stanley research lays bare the impact on UK workersNews Analysis of five sectors highlights an "early warning sign" of AI’s impact on jobs
-
A new study claims AI will destroy 10.4 million roles in the US by 2030, more than the number of jobs lost in the Great Recession – but analysts still insist there won’t be a ‘jobs apocalypse’News A frantic push to automate roles with AI could come back to haunt many enterprises, according to Forrester
-
Businesses aren't laying off staff because of AI, they're using it as an excuse to distract from 'weak demand or excessive hiring'News It's sexier to say AI caused redundancies than it is to admit the economy is bad or overhiring has happened
-
'This acquisition was the worst thing for us': Synopsys staff brace for layoffs following Ansys mergerNews The $35bn deal has sparked a restructuring that will see 10% of jobs lost