Lords drop Clause 17, add power to ban sites
The House of Lords has dropped a controversial bit of the Digital Economy Bill, but added the ability to block websites with illegal content in its place.
The House of Lords has dropped the controversial Clause 17 from the Digital Economy Bill, but added a new section that would allow the Government to block access to websites that were hosting illegally shared content.
Clause 17 would have allowed the Government to change copyright law using a tool called "statutory instrument", without taking to to parliament first.
While that news will cheer rights campaigners, a pair of Conservative and Liberal Democrat Lords also tabled a change that would "prevent access to specified online locations for the prevention of online copyright infringement".
If approved, it means courts will be able to prevent access to websites if they are found to have a "substantial proportion" of such content available, but must consider if the site has done anything to stop the copyright infringement.
In a post on the Open Rights Group blog, director Jim Killock said: "This would open the door to a massive imbalance of power in favour of large copyright holding companies."
"Individuals and small businesses would be open to massive 'copyright attacks' that could shut them down, just by the threat of action," he added.
Read on for more about the evolution of the Digital Economy Bill.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
Freelance journalist Nicole Kobie first started writing for ITPro in 2007, with bylines in New Scientist, Wired, PC Pro and many more.
Nicole the author of a book about the history of technology, The Long History of the Future.
-
What does modern security success look like for financial services?Sponsored As financial institutions grapple with evolving cyber threats, intensifying regulations, and the limitations of ageing IT infrastructure, the need for a resilient and forward-thinking security strategy has never been greater
-
Yes, legal AI. But what can you actually do with it? Let’s take a look…Sponsored Legal AI is a knowledge multiplier that can accelerate research, sharpen insights, and organize information, provided legal teams have confidence in its transparent and auditable application
-
Truss seeks last-ditch SoftBank meeting over Arm IPONews Gov said to want a dual New York-London listing, at the very least
-
Pivotal believes IPO will net $592 millionNews Dell's cloudy subsidiary details IPO plans in filing
-
Slump raises questions over tech IPO valuationsNews Shares in major tech firms dip, but are more losses to come?
-
Spotify 'might ditch an IPO in favour of direct listing'News Report - move would see the company bypass institutional investors
-
CLA CIO Adam Sewell on selecting Microsoft Azure for ‘contractual reasons’In-depth Cloud has brought issues with contracts, terminology and skills, says Sewell
-
Snap IPO value hits $30 billion at close of marketNews Shares jump 44% as investors get behind stock market debut
-
European copyright law: how it affects youIn-depth The EU is looking to harmonise copyright law, and Google isn’t happy. But should you be?
-
Former employee accuses Snapchat of 'misrepresenting growth'News The whistleblower is now suing Snapchat for intentionally "seeking to destroy his career and reputation"
