Most comments in FCC net neutrality consultation were reportedly fake

Subcontractors allegedly used stolen data for government petitions

Net neutrality on an abstract tech background

Millions of anti-net neutrality comments submitted to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) were fake, according to yesterday's report from the State of New York.

The report, commissioned by New York Attorney General Letitia James, investigated a public consultation held by the FCC over its plans to repeal net neutrality rules in 2018. That consultation, which ultimately resulted in the FCC repealing the rules and eliminating net neutrality, was corrupted by a massive ISP-backed campaign to generate anti-net neutrality comments. The subcontractors who generated the comments did so fraudulently while broadband industry backers turned a blind eye, the report says.

The campaign used a technique known as astroturfing, in which lobbyists control supposed public interest groups to steer public opinion. 

It began with a document circulated among senior broadband industry executives several days before Donald Trump’s inauguration in January 2017. The document suggested funding a campaign to collect comments for the FCC to provide then-chairman Ajit Pai with what executives called "intellectual cover" to repeal the net neutrality rules.

This campaign operated through a nonprofit called Broadband for America (BFA), with an executive committee comprising broadband executives. 

This nonprofit spent $8.5 million on anti-net neutrality lobbying, most of which came from three of America's largest broadband companies. However, the campaign was operated through several non-profit entities, including American Commitment, the Center for Individual Freedoms, and the Taxpayers Protection Alliance. The BFA controlled everything, the report said.

These astroturfing groups operated their own comment collection pages, although they collected few comments. In reality, the BFA's lobbying firm enlisted co-registration lead generation companies to generate and submit comments, all of which used fraudulent tactics, the report said.

Co-registration companies promise free prizes and coupons to consumers in return for registering their names and contact details online, and, in some cases, responding to survey questions. The companies allegedly promised to solicit comment on the net neutrality rules via these sites, but it instead merely copied information from past registrants, whose names were submitted to the FCC as opposing net neutrality without their consent. 

When consumers complained about these acts,, New York-based co-registration company Fluent allegedly lied to the BFA and fabricated landing pages with the solicitations.

Other co-registration companies commissioned by the lobbying firm subcontracted the work to a network of others, creating what the report called "an environment ripe for fraud." One of the subcontractors didn't even operate co-registration sites.

Related Resource

Cost of a data breach report 2020

Find out what factors help mitigate breach costs

cost of a data breach report 2020 - whitepaper from IBMDownload now

Another contractor, which promised to run online advertisements soliciting comment, instead used names and addresses stolen during a data breach and dumped online in 2016.

One company used a text generation program to generate over a million fake comments for submission to the FCC, attaching them to fraudulently gathered names and email addresses.

The BFA acknowledged, discussed, and ultimately ignored red flags that pointed to fraudulent activities, the report added.

Not all fraud supported repealing the net neutrality rules, though. In another incident, a college student used automated software to submit 9.3 million comments to the FCC supporting net neutrality using easily fabricated names and email addresses.

Overall, nearly 18 million of the more than 22 million comments the FCC received in its public consultation were fake, James said.

The State of New York has imposed penalties on participants who collected the fraudulent comments: Fluent, Opt-Intelligence, and React2Media. Between them, they must pay $4.4 million in penalties and instigate reforms.

Featured Resources

Modern governance: The how-to guide

Equipping organisations with the right tools for business resilience

Free Download

Cloud operational excellence

Everything you need to know about optimising your cloud operations

Watch now

A buyer’s guide to board management software

Improve your board’s performance

The real world business value of Oracle autonomous data warehouse

Lead with a 417% five-year ROI

Download now


US companies have less than a five-day supply of semiconductors

US companies have less than a five-day supply of semiconductors

26 Jan 2022
Biden nominates Meg Whitman for ambassador role in Kenya
Policy & legislation

Biden nominates Meg Whitman for ambassador role in Kenya

10 Dec 2021
UK and US agree deeper data-sharing partnership
Policy & legislation

UK and US agree deeper data-sharing partnership

9 Dec 2021 and Sterling Check partner on in-person identity verification
identity and access management (IAM) and Sterling Check partner on in-person identity verification

19 Nov 2021

Most Popular

How to boot Windows 11 in Safe Mode
Microsoft Windows

How to boot Windows 11 in Safe Mode

6 Jan 2022
Sony pulls out of MWC 2022
Business operations

Sony pulls out of MWC 2022

14 Jan 2022
Dell XPS 15 (2021) review: The best just got better

Dell XPS 15 (2021) review: The best just got better

14 Jan 2022