Most comments in FCC net neutrality consultation were reportedly fake

Subcontractors allegedly used stolen data for government petitions

Net neutrality on an abstract tech background

Millions of anti-net neutrality comments submitted to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) were fake, according to yesterday's report from the State of New York.

The report, commissioned by New York Attorney General Letitia James, investigated a public consultation held by the FCC over its plans to repeal net neutrality rules in 2018. That consultation, which ultimately resulted in the FCC repealing the rules and eliminating net neutrality, was corrupted by a massive ISP-backed campaign to generate anti-net neutrality comments. The subcontractors who generated the comments did so fraudulently while broadband industry backers turned a blind eye, the report says.

The campaign used a technique known as astroturfing, in which lobbyists control supposed public interest groups to steer public opinion. 

It began with a document circulated among senior broadband industry executives several days before Donald Trump’s inauguration in January 2017. The document suggested funding a campaign to collect comments for the FCC to provide then-chairman Ajit Pai with what executives called "intellectual cover" to repeal the net neutrality rules.

This campaign operated through a nonprofit called Broadband for America (BFA), with an executive committee comprising broadband executives. 

This nonprofit spent $8.5 million on anti-net neutrality lobbying, most of which came from three of America's largest broadband companies. However, the campaign was operated through several non-profit entities, including American Commitment, the Center for Individual Freedoms, and the Taxpayers Protection Alliance. The BFA controlled everything, the report said.

These astroturfing groups operated their own comment collection pages, although they collected few comments. In reality, the BFA's lobbying firm enlisted co-registration lead generation companies to generate and submit comments, all of which used fraudulent tactics, the report said.

Co-registration companies promise free prizes and coupons to consumers in return for registering their names and contact details online, and, in some cases, responding to survey questions. The companies allegedly promised to solicit comment on the net neutrality rules via these sites, but it instead merely copied information from past registrants, whose names were submitted to the FCC as opposing net neutrality without their consent. 

When consumers complained about these acts,, New York-based co-registration company Fluent allegedly lied to the BFA and fabricated landing pages with the solicitations.

Other co-registration companies commissioned by the lobbying firm subcontracted the work to a network of others, creating what the report called "an environment ripe for fraud." One of the subcontractors didn't even operate co-registration sites.

Related Resource

Cost of a data breach report 2020

Find out what factors help mitigate breach costs

cost of a data breach report 2020 - whitepaper from IBMDownload now

Another contractor, which promised to run online advertisements soliciting comment, instead used names and addresses stolen during a data breach and dumped online in 2016.

One company used a text generation program to generate over a million fake comments for submission to the FCC, attaching them to fraudulently gathered names and email addresses.

The BFA acknowledged, discussed, and ultimately ignored red flags that pointed to fraudulent activities, the report added.

Not all fraud supported repealing the net neutrality rules, though. In another incident, a college student used automated software to submit 9.3 million comments to the FCC supporting net neutrality using easily fabricated names and email addresses.

Overall, nearly 18 million of the more than 22 million comments the FCC received in its public consultation were fake, James said.

The State of New York has imposed penalties on participants who collected the fraudulent comments: Fluent, Opt-Intelligence, and React2Media. Between them, they must pay $4.4 million in penalties and instigate reforms.

Featured Resources

Consumer choice and the payment experience

A software provider's guide to getting, growing, and keeping customers

Download now

Prevent fraud and phishing attacks with DMARC

How to use domain-based message authentication, reporting, and conformance for email security

Download now

Business in the new economy landscape

How we coped with 2020 and looking ahead to a brighter 2021

Download now

How to increase cyber resilience within your organisation

Cyber resilience for dummies

Download now

Recommended

Senator questions Amazon and Google’s smart home devices
Internet of Things (IoT)

Senator questions Amazon and Google’s smart home devices

23 Jun 2021
Feds rescind prohibited transactions list for TikTok and WeChat
social media

Feds rescind prohibited transactions list for TikTok and WeChat

21 Jun 2021
Senators propose a tax credit for US-based chip manufacturers
Hardware

Senators propose a tax credit for US-based chip manufacturers

18 Jun 2021
Senator reintroduces federal data protection bill
data protection

Senator reintroduces federal data protection bill

17 Jun 2021

Most Popular

Best paying tech jobs of 2021
Careers & training

Best paying tech jobs of 2021

7 Jun 2021
Ten-year-old iOS 4 recreated as an iPhone app
iOS

Ten-year-old iOS 4 recreated as an iPhone app

10 Jun 2021
Mythic launches power-sipping AI chip
Hardware

Mythic launches power-sipping AI chip

8 Jun 2021