Hackers are turning to AI tools to reverse engineer millions of apps – and it’s causing havoc for security professionals
AI tools make it simple for threat actors to reverse-engineer, analyze, and exploit applications
A marked surge in attacks on client-side apps could be due to the growing use of AI tools among cyber criminals, according to new research from Digital.ai.
More than eight-in-ten applications are under constant attack, marking a near 20% increase compared to last year, the study found.
Attack rates are rising fast across all industries, most significantly in telecoms, where more than nine-in-ten organizations were attacked, followed by financial services at 88%.
Notably, industries such as healthcare and automotive are now under significant threat, with 86% of automotive apps and 79% of healthcare-related applications under attack.
While Android apps have in the past been the main target, with 90% affected, the gap has narrowed. The number of iOS attacks has risen to 88%, thanks to jailbreaking and more sophisticated exploitation techniques.
Environment attacks, where apps run in compromised conditions such as rooted or jailbroken devices, affected 84% of Android apps and 80% of iOS apps.
"For enterprises, apps represent a gainful bridge to their consumers and employees, but for threat actors, these apps represent lucrative targets," said Derek Holt, CEO of Digital.ai.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2026 report - the leading resource for IT decision-maker insight on priorities and investment areas in AI, security and more.
"Today, we see more attackers expanding their focus to target not just flagship apps but secondary apps, plugins, add-ons and more".
Android’s open architecture raises questions
The study specifically highlighted the rise of ‘instrumentation attacks’, which involve dynamic code modification or hooking frameworks like Frida.
These were much more common on Android, researchers found, occurring at a rate of 82% compared with 44% on iOS.
A key factor here is because Android’s open architecture makes it more susceptible to runtime manipulation, whereas iOS has stronger built-in restrictions.
Integrity attacks, meanwhile, where app code is modified or repackaged, affected 52% of Android apps and 23.3% of iOS apps.
Again, Android’s app distribution model and third-party app stores make it easier for attackers to distribute modified apps, whereas iOS has tighter app store controls.
Attack surfaces are growing
Concerningly, the attack surface is growing, with Apple’s App Store and the Google Play store together offering nearly four million apps for downloads, with 137.8 billion downloads in 2024.
The rise of effective and freely-available AI tools has made it easier than ever for threat actors to easily reverse-engineer, analyze, and exploit many of these applications.
It’s also given rise to a burgeoning community of threat actors, many of whom are taking advantage of reverse-engineering tools such as Frida and Ghidra, sharing ideas, tips, and tricks.
RELATED WHITEPAPER
Meanwhile, AI tools are fueling a further rise in the rapid development of malware, while supporting threat actors in conducting source code analysis.
"As AI exponentially increases the capabilities of threat actors, businesses must dramatically increase their ability to protect and monitor all applications against reverse engineering, tampering, and man-in-the-middle attacks," said Holt.
"Delivering applications without these security protections is like leaving your front door unlocked and wide open."
MORE FROM ITPRO
Emma Woollacott is a freelance journalist writing for publications including the BBC, Private Eye, Forbes, Raconteur and specialist technology titles.
-
The Binance hack explainedNews Initial reports that a single compromised laptop was the cause of the Binance hack have been debunked by the crypto exchange firm
-
Lakeside Software taps Mark Benson to lead EMEA channel strategyNews The appointment comes as the digital employee experience (DEX) vendor looks to expand its partner ecosystem around the SysTrack platform
-
88% of UK firms have had an “agentic security incident” in the last year – ServiceNow warns more will comeNews Concerns are growing over the scale of adoption and an inability to match “machine-speed” capabilities
-
‘Rising threats and under-resourcing for cybersecurity is taking a toll on the people tasked with managing it’: Cyber teams are being pushed to breaking point – and AI is doing little to alleviate strainNews An increasingly perilous threat landscape and lack of funding means cyber teams are being stretched too thin
-
Anthropic’s Mythos AI tried to dupe devs in social engineering attack, collaborated with other agentsInter-agent collaboration is a serious cause for concern, says security expert
-
Anthropic joins OpenAI in admitting loss of control in cybersecurity testsThe company found Claude AI had escaped containment three times and targeted other organizations
-
'It delivers world-class performance at 50 percent of the cost of leading models': Microsoft unveils cut-price AI for security with latest in-house model launchNews Pairing the MAI security model with GPT-5.4 gives benchmark leading results at half the cost, according to the tech giant
-
The case for the channel in an AI-driven security marketIndustry Insights AI won't replace channel partners; SMB cybersecurity still relies on trust
-
Cisco just launched two cyber-focused small language models: Antares-350M and Antares-1B aim to supercharge codebase analysis – and they run at a “fraction of the compute expense” of popular frontier modelsNews The Antares models unveiled by Cisco aim to cut costs in codebase analysis
-
Cyber professionals are flocking to AI tools, but they’re getting tired of fixing mistakes and reviewing outputsNews Cyber pros are spending significantly more time validating AI outputs and deciding when to trust AI-generated recommendations