AI is now becoming a “standard in developers’ lives” according to JetBrains, but software teams in the UK are taking a far more cautious approach to the technology than international counterparts.
Findings from the company’s 2025 State of Developer Ecosystem report show 85% of developers globally regularly use AI for activities such as coding. Similarly, nearly two-thirds (62%) use at least one AI coding assistant, agent, or code editor in their daily workflow.
Yet drilling down into regional and national perception of the technology, it appears many UK developers aren’t fully sold. More than a quarter (27%), for example, said they’re still “uncertain” about the use of AI.
This lingering uncertainty is reflected in daily use of the technology, JetBrains noted. The rate of those not using AI tools (16%) is more than double the global average, which currently stands at 7%.
So what’s behind this hesitancy? JetBrains attributed the stats to a “community that values understanding and control over early adoption” – and it’s clear that several key aspects of the technology are a cause for concern. Code quality, security, and privacy are all notable areas in this regard.
UK developers prefer to keep a lid on things
“UK developers are keeping themselves firmly in the loop,” JetBrains noted. Indeed, nearly half (48%) of developers across the country said they prefer to “stay hands-on” with core tasks such as code reviews and testing in a bid to maintain quality standards.
Simply put, a higher percentage of UK developers are keen to keep a lid on things when using the technology compared to their international counterparts (38%).
Speaking to ITPro, Curtis Wilson, data scientist at Black Duck, said developers have “good reason” for this cautious stance for a number of reasons.
“A large portion of the developer workforce here is working in enterprise software, especially finance,” he explained. “The stakes are high, and the rules are tight.”
“In those kinds of environments, handing over core tasks like testing or code reviews to AI isn’t just a technical decision, it’s a matter of professional responsibility.”
Concerns over code quality have been a long-running issue since the influx of AI tools in software development. Analysis from Google’s 2024 State of DevOps report found over one-third (39%) of developers have little-to-no trust in AI-generated code.
This lack of trust came in spite of the fact 75% use the technology for core tasks such as writing code.
More recent analysis from Stack Overflow also highlighted this lingering hesitancy over AI code generation. Findings from its 2025 Developer Survey show half (46%) “don’t trust the accuracy” of AI outputs, which marked an increase compared to 31% in the year prior.
Wilson said these concerns, combined with the industries a significant portion of UK developers work in, mean many are content with holding off on diving headlong into AI-powered development practices at present.
“Compared to developers in other regions, who are often working in faster-moving, consumer-facing sectors, UK teams are right to take their time,” he said. “The tools are improving, but they’re still prone to subtle errors that can be hard to catch and costly to fix.
“Once the regulatory picture settles and the tooling matures a bit more, we’ll likely see more confident adoption. But for now, the caution isn’t holding the UK back, it’s helping ensure AI is adopted responsibly.”
Not worth the risk
While AI coding tools have improved significantly over the last year, the risks associated with this trend are growing, according to recent studies. A survey from Aikido found one-in-five CISOs admitted they’ve suffered major security incidents as a result of AI-generated code.
With solutions in this domain now being used to write around a quarter (24%) of production code, the Aikido study once again highlighted a more conservative approach among UK and European developers.
Just 21% of European devs use these tools, compared to 29% in the US, and from a security perspective this hesitancy is paying dividends on this side of the Atlantic.
US-based respondents were among the worst hit by AI-related flaws, with 45% of respondents reporting serious incidents – more than double their European counterparts.
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
MORE FROM ITPRO
-
How businesses can manage software end of lifeColumn When software reaches end of life, it can cause security and IT management headaches – but this can be avoided
-
Computacenter enters the fray against Broadcom in Tesco's VMware lawsuitNews The IT reseller has added its own claim against Broadcom in VMware case brought by Tesco
-
AI-generated code is now the cause of one-in-five breaches – but developers and security leaders alike are convinced the technology will come good eventuallyNews AI coding tools now write 24% of production code globally, but it's risky and causing issues for developers and security practitioners alike.
-
Anthropic’s new Claude Code web portal aims to make AI coding even more accessibleNews Claude Code for web runs entirely in a user’s browser of choice rather than in a command-line interface and can be connected directly to chosen GitHub repositories.
-
The UK’s aging developer workforce needs a ‘steady pipeline’ of talent to meet future demand – but AI’s impact on entry-level jobs and changing skills requirements mean it could be fighting an uphill battleAnalysis With the average age of developers in the UK rising, concerns are growing about the flow of talent into the sector
-
AI coding really isn't living up to expectations – "the savings have been unremarkable" but not for the reason you might thinkNews Companies are focusing too heavily on simple AI coding tasks, and not overhauling wider business processes
-
UK government programmers trialed AI coding assistants from Microsoft, GitHub, and Google – here's what they foundNews Developers participating in a trial of AI coding tools from Google, Microsoft, and GitHub reported big time savings, with 58% saying they now couldn't work without them.
-
Microsoft touts new Copilot features in Excel, but says you shouldn’t use them if you want accurate resultsNews Microsoft has warned against using new AI features in Excel for “tasks with legal, regulatory, or compliance implications” – so when can you use it?
-
Senior developers are all in on vibe coding, but junior staff lack the experience to spot critical flawsNews Experienced developers are far more confident in using AI-generated code
-
Microsoft says AI is finally having a 'meaningful impact' on developer productivity – and 80% 'would be sad if they could no longer use it'News Researchers at Microsoft wanted to demystify how AI is being used by software developers – their findings show the benefits are finally becoming clear.
