Senior developers are all in on vibe coding, but junior staff lack the experience to spot critical flaws
Experienced developers are far more confident in using AI-generated code
Senior software developers are among the most receptive to AI code generation tools, according to new research.
A study from Fastly shows roughly one-third of senior developers, classed as those with over 10 years of experience, regularly use AI tools to build software. This is nearly two and a half times the rate of junior colleagues, the study noted.
While Fastly said the study highlights the growing appeal of AI-generated code, there are notable downsides – mainly fixing faulty code. Developers across all levels reported issues in this regard, with time savings often being negated by manual remediation.
“Senior developers were also more likely [than juniors] to say they invest time fixing AI-generated code,” the company said in a blog post detailing the research. “Just under 30% of seniors reported editing AI output enough to offset most of the time savings, compared to 17% of juniors.”
Remediating faulty code has emerged as a key hurdle for developers using AI tools in recent months.
Google’s 2024 State of DevOps report noted growing developer concerns about code quality, for example. A similar study from Cloudsmith in June 2025 warned some enterprises were overlooking key security considerations in a bid to drive efficiency.
Analysis from Harness in January this year found the issue had reached such an extent that developers were growing frustrated with the new tools at their disposal.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
More than two-thirds (67%) reported spending more time debugging AI-generated code than prior to the introduction of the tools. Around 68%, meanwhile, now spend more time resolving vulnerabilities.
Regardless, Fastly found that senior developers appear more than content with using AI tools, and are confident in their ability to spot potential issues during development.
More than half (59%) of senior devs said AI tools “help them ship faster overall” while 49% of juniors held the same view. Senior staff were also more likely to report “significant speed gains” (26%) compared to less experienced colleagues, (13%).
Experience breeds confidence
According to Fastly, a key factor behind the confidence observed among senior developers is that they’re “simply better equipped to catch and correct AI’s mistakes”.
“They have the experience to recognize when code ‘looks right’ but isn’t,” the company said. “That makes them more confident at using AI tools efficiently, even for high-stakes or business-critical code.”
Meanwhile, junior developers are typically more cautious about relying on AI, or “more likely to avoid using it in production at all”.
“More experienced engineers are not only using AI more aggressively, but are also trusting it more in production environments,” Fastly added.
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
MORE FROM ITPRO
- AI coding tools are finally delivering results for enterprises
- AI coding tools are booming – and developers in this one country are by far the most frequent users
- How AI coding is transforming the IT industry in 2025

Ross Kelly is ITPro's News & Analysis Editor, responsible for leading the brand's news output and in-depth reporting on the latest stories from across the business technology landscape. Ross was previously a Staff Writer, during which time he developed a keen interest in cyber security, business leadership, and emerging technologies.
He graduated from Edinburgh Napier University in 2016 with a BA (Hons) in Journalism, and joined ITPro in 2022 after four years working in technology conference research.
For news pitches, you can contact Ross at ross.kelly@futurenet.com, or on Twitter and LinkedIn.
-
So much for ‘trust but verify’: Nearly half of software developers don’t check AI-generated code – and 38% say it's because it takes longer than reviewing code produced by colleaguesNews A concerning number of developers are failing to check AI-generated code, exposing enterprises to huge security threats
-
Microsoft is shaking up GitHub in preparation for a battle with AI coding rivalsNews The tech giant is bracing itself for a looming battle in the AI coding space
-
AI could truly transform software development in 2026 – but developer teams still face big challenges with adoption, security, and productivityAnalysis AI adoption is expected to continue transforming software development processes, but there are big challenges ahead
-
‘1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code’: Microsoft wants to replace C and C++ code with Rust by 2030 – but a senior engineer insists the company has no plans on using AI to rewrite Windows source codeNews Windows won’t be rewritten in Rust using AI, according to a senior Microsoft engineer, but the company still has bold plans for embracing the popular programming language
-
AI is creating more software flaws – and they're getting worseNews A CodeRabbit study compared pull requests with AI and without, finding AI is fast but highly error prone
-
AI doesn’t mean your developers are obsolete — if anything you’re probably going to need bigger teamsAnalysis Software developers may be forgiven for worrying about their jobs in 2025, but the end result of AI adoption will probably be larger teams, not an onslaught of job cuts.
-
Anthropic says MCP will stay 'open, neutral, and community-driven' after donating project to Linux FoundationNews The AAIF aims to standardize agentic AI development and create an open ecosystem for developers
-
Atlassian just launched a new ChatGPT connector feature for Jira and Confluence — here's what users can expectNews The company says the new features will make it easier to summarize updates, surface insights, and act on information in Jira and Confluence

