Breaking boundaries: Empowering channel partners to unite DevOps and MLOps for a stronger software supply chain
Unifying DevOps and MLOps speeds delivery, strengthens governance, and improves software supply chain efficiency
Stay up to date with the latest Channel industry news and analysis with our twice-weekly newsletter
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
As businesses incorporate machine learning into their commercial strategies, the race to innovate and stay ahead of the market has highlighted some new challenges.
Traditionally, software development (DevOps) and machine learning (MLOps) teams have operated with separate workflows, tools, and objectives. In today’s environment, this leads to inefficiencies and redundancies that can hamper software delivery.
What are the risks of sticking with the status quo? How can the two teams be bridged together?
Siloed pipelines create blockers
DevOps pipelines are built around continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD), emphasizing speed and reliability. MLOps, on the other hand, introduces stages such as data preparation, training models, and validation. When these operations are managed separately, the handoff from data science to engineering can be slow and error-prone. Data scientists may work in one environment, while engineers work in another, often requiring manual steps that disrupt the overall software lifecycle.
Different toolchains only exacerbate the problem. DevOps and MLOps both require automation, reproducibility, and version control. However, keeping two systems running at the same time is a waste of resources when they’re designed to achieve the same goal.
Channel providers who serve these infrastructures typically have to deal with many of these cases, adding complexity without delivering extra value. Silos between teams further complicate matters, with broken communication and misaligned objectives.
Unlike traditional code, ML models often rely on dynamic, data-driven outputs that can change depending on their training data or hyperparameters used. As a result, they don’t always fit neatly into existing DevOps pipelines, meaning standard testing, validation, or security checks can be skipped or inconsistently applied.
Stay up to date with the latest Channel industry news and analysis with our twice-weekly newsletter
These problems increase the time it takes to get AI-powered features to market. Limited traceability of model versions, training data, and hyperparameters makes troubleshooting and auditing cumbersome, raising concerns about governance, compliance, and accountability.
The case for unification
The solution, as many organizations are discovering, is to combine DevOps and MLOps into a single, cohesive software supply chain. This approach doesn’t overlook the unique requirements of machine learning, though. Indeed, it treats artificial intelligence (AI) as if it were any other software component, creating a system of consistent protocols, whether for code snippets or trained models.
DevOps and MLOps share some of the same goals: rapid delivery, automation, and reliability. Aligning around these goals helps organizations and channel partners to operate more efficiently, reduce redundant work, and foster better collaboration.
The way to achieve true unification is to treat ML models as first-class software artifacts. Like binaries, libraries, and configuration files, models should be versioned, tested, and distributed through the same automated pipelines. This ensures unified visibility, so teams can keep track of which model version aligns with which release, reducing confusion and ensuring reproducibility.
Integrating models into these workflows extends automation across the entire lifecycle, from preparing data to deploying it, which cuts down on human handoffs and speeds up delivery from start to finish.
This approach also improves collaboration between data scientists, engineers, and operations teams. Sharing infrastructure and using the same processes makes communication simpler and allows for smoother handoffs.
Governance is also strengthened by subjecting ML models to the same quality assurance, security scanning, and compliance checks as other software components. For channel partners tasked with safeguarding software supply chains, this consistency is essential.
Opportunities for the channel
For the IT channel, bringing DevOps and MLOps together is both a challenge and an opportunity.
Organizations want to use AI, but they often lack the skills or infrastructure to do so. Partners who help customers set up these pipelines enable them to deliver faster, more reliable, and compliant solutions. Channel providers are at the vanguard of AI-driven innovation when they bridge the gap between DevOps and MLOps.
Companies need to be able to quickly and safely migrate models from testing to production to realize AI’s potential. There has to be a single software supply chain where ML models are handled like first-class assets and workflows are automated from start to finish. For channel partners, this method helps customers grow their AI projects while making sure that quality, security, and governance are maintained throughout the software lifecycle.
As organisations race to adopt more software and models, the industry needs holistic governance. Currently, only 60% of companies have full visibility into software that is running in production. Combining DevOps and MLOps into one software supply chain can help companies achieve their shared goals of rapid delivery, automation, and reliability. This will create an efficient and secure environment for building, testing, and deploying the entire spectrum of software, from application code to machine learning models.

Yuval is the co-founder and CTO of Qwak and currently serves as vice president and CTO of MLOps following Qwak’s acquisition by JFrog.
In his role, he pioneers a fully managed, user-friendly machine learning (ML) platform, enabling creators to reshape data, construct, train, and deploy models, and meticulously oversee the complete ML lifecycle.
-
Why MSPs need data-driven strategies in 2026Industry Insights Data-driven MSPs can make smarter business decisions and, ultimately, deliver a better service
-
Rethinking fraud prevention: From identity checks to identity signal integritySponsored With new techniques being used by criminals, fraud detection has to move with the times to ensure security
-
Developers are slacking on AI-generated code safety – here's why it could come back to haunt themNews While organizations are aware of the risks, many are spending little time or effort on tracking artifact versions, origins, and security attestations
-
Four things you need to know about GitHub's AI model training policy – including how to opt outNews Users of certain GitHub Copilot plans will have interaction data used to train AI models, but can opt out
-
'AI doesn't solve the burnout problem. If anything, it amplifies it': AI coding tools might supercharge software development, but working at 'machine speed' has a big impact on developersNews Developers using AI coding tools are shipping products faster, but velocity is creating cracks across the delivery pipeline
-
‘I hope there's a world where AI is is complementary to humans’: Workday CEO vows to support HR workers as Sana integration automates more processes than ever beforeNews Sana from Workday seeks to bring agentic AI to Workday’s systems and beyond with natural language input and third-party connectors
-
‘AI tools are now able to transcend their initial training’: Researchers taught GPT-5 to learn an obscure programming language on its ownNews OpenAI’s GPT-5 learned to code in Idris despite a lack of available data, baffling researchers
-
Zoom users can now create their own custom AI agentsNews The workplace collaboration giant is going all in on "agentic AI orchestration"
-
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella says 'anyone can be a software developer' with AI, but skills and experience are still vitalNews AI will cause job losses in software development, Nadella admitted, but claimed many will reskill and adapt to new ways of working
-
Claude Code flaws left AI tool wide open to hackers – here’s what developers need to knowNews The trio of Claude code flaws could have put developers at risk of attacks