AI coding tools are booming – and developers in this one country are by far the most frequent users
Software developers in the US are by far the most bullish on AI coding tools
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
The popularity of AI coding tools has skyrocketed over the last year and a half, with developers flocking to these solutions to supercharge their daily workflows.
A host of major industry players, including Microsoft, Google, and Amazon Web Services (AWS), have all unveiled dedicated tools for software development.
A new research paper shows there’s a growing geographic disparity in terms of the popularity of AI coding tools.
The paper, titled ‘Who is using AI to code? Global diffusion and impact of generative AI’, examined the use of AI in software development globally, finding that US developers are among the most frequent users.
Researchers tracked AI-generated Python functions in GitHub to identify the regions where the technology was being used most frequently, noting that by December 2024 around 30.1% Python functions came from US contributors.
This comes in stark contrast to counterparts elsewhere globally, researchers found. Around 24.3% of Python functions came from users based in Germany, while France and India stood at 23.2% and 21.6% respectively.
Notably, contributions from Russia and China lagged significantly, recorded at just 15.4% and 11.7% respectively.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
Broadly speaking, US developers have led consistently over the last few years, the paper found, particularly since the advent of the generative AI ‘boom’ and running in parallel to various model releases since late 2022.
“We observe noticeable growth spikes in AI-generated code soon after key generative AI releases such as GitHub Copilot, the original ChatGPT, and GPT-4.0, highlighting how breakthroughs in LLMs prompt rapid uptake by developers worldwide,” the paper reads.
“Yet, we also observe significant differences among countries. In the US, which leads in the intensity of use of AI throughout our data, AI-written code grows from 0% in 2020 to approximately 30% by the end of 2024,” researchers added.
“Contributions from Germany, France, India, Russia, and China vary between 12 and 24% in 2024, suggesting significant geographic barriers to diffusion.”
The researchers’ findings on the popularity of AI-generated code align with recent confirmations from major tech firms on this front. In November last year, Google CEO Sundar Pichai revealed that around 25% of the tech giant’s internal code was written using AI, and this has likely since grown.
More recently, Microsoft chief executive Satya Nadella also highlighted the scale of the company’s AI-generated code, with this now standing at around 30%.
How developers are using AI coding tools
Perhaps unsurprisingly, more experienced and senior developers were less likely to use AI coding tools compared to their junior colleagues. This aligns with existing studies on the uptake of these solutions based on seniority, researchers noted.
The impact of AI on junior developers has become a recurring talking point in recent months, with studies warning that entry-level roles could be adversely impacted by the technology.
Some industry stakeholders have also warned that frequent use of the technology is creating an overreliance that undermines core coding skills.
But those entering the profession are more likely to be accustomed to using these tools, according to GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke.
In a recent podcast appearance, Dohmke noted that many junior developers are ‘AI native’ and have been using AI throughout their time at college and university, or even earlier on in high school, making them more comfortable with using the technology.
The economic impact of AI in software development
Industry providers have been keen to highlight the benefits of AI coding tools, and AI solutions more broadly, in recent years. Productivity boosts, efficiency gains, and speedier development processes have all been touted as key advantages.
Research from GitHub last year, for example, showed these solutions are delivering marked benefits for users, allowing developers to streamline tasks in their daily workflow and focus on more pressing matters.
However, the research paper noted that the economic benefits of the technology vary wildly, and are often dependent on whether organizations and teams are effectively using AI.
Researchers noted that the economic value of AI-assisted coding in the US stands at anywhere from $9.6 billion and $14.4 billion annually.
MORE FROM ITPRO
- Big tech promised developers productivity gains with AI tools – now they’re being rendered obsolete
- Developers are at their wits end trying to build generative AI applications
- Want developers to build secure software? You need to ditch these two programming languages

Ross Kelly is ITPro's News & Analysis Editor, responsible for leading the brand's news output and in-depth reporting on the latest stories from across the business technology landscape. Ross was previously a Staff Writer, during which time he developed a keen interest in cyber security, business leadership, and emerging technologies.
He graduated from Edinburgh Napier University in 2016 with a BA (Hons) in Journalism, and joined ITPro in 2022 after four years working in technology conference research.
For news pitches, you can contact Ross at ross.kelly@futurenet.com, or on Twitter and LinkedIn.
-
Stop treating agentic AI projects like traditional softwareAnalysis Designing and building agents is one thing, but testing and governance is crucial to success
-
PayPal appoints HP’s Enrique Lores in surprise CEO shake-upNews The veteran tech executive will lead the payments giant into its next growth phase amid mounting industry challenges
-
‘Not a shortcut to competence’: Anthropic researchers say AI tools are improving developer productivity – but the technology could ‘inhibit skills formation’News A research paper from Anthropic suggests we need to be careful deploying AI to avoid losing critical skills
-
A torrent of AI slop submissions forced an open source project to scrap its bug bounty program – maintainer claims they’re removing the “incentive for people to submit crap”News Curl isn’t the only open source project inundated with AI slop submissions
-
‘This is a platform shift’: Jensen Huang says the traditional computing stack will never look the same because of AI – ChatGPT and Claude will forge a new generation of applicationsNews The Nvidia chief says new applications will be built “on top of ChatGPT” as the technology redefines software
-
So much for ‘trust but verify’: Nearly half of software developers don’t check AI-generated code – and 38% say it's because it takes longer than reviewing code produced by colleaguesNews A concerning number of developers are failing to check AI-generated code, exposing enterprises to huge security threats
-
Microsoft is shaking up GitHub in preparation for a battle with AI coding rivalsNews The tech giant is bracing itself for a looming battle in the AI coding space
-
AI could truly transform software development in 2026 – but developer teams still face big challenges with adoption, security, and productivityAnalysis AI adoption is expected to continue transforming software development processes, but there are big challenges ahead
-
‘1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code’: Microsoft wants to replace C and C++ code with Rust by 2030 – but a senior engineer insists the company has no plans on using AI to rewrite Windows source codeNews Windows won’t be rewritten in Rust using AI, according to a senior Microsoft engineer, but the company still has bold plans for embracing the popular programming language
-
AI is creating more software flaws – and they're getting worseNews A CodeRabbit study compared pull requests with AI and without, finding AI is fast but highly error prone