Facebook defends privacy measures in open letter response
Social networking giant Facebook has responded to privacy groups' concerns in an open letter of its own, defending its approach to privacy and arguing further measures are not needed.
Facebook has responded to an open letter from advocacy groups raising concerns over the social network's approach to user policies, issuing a point-by-point rebuttal in an open letter of its own.
The original letter, which was sent last Wednesday addressed to Facebook's chief executive Mark Zuckerberg, praised the company's recent efforts in addressing some privacy concerns head on, but went on to call for six specific changes that would "continue to demonstrate your commitment to the principle of giving users control over how and with whom they share".
The suggestions including switching to an HTTPS connection for all interactions by default, giving users the power to control exactly which apps and third-party plugins are able to access their personal details, and providing tools to assist users with migrating their data out of Facebook should they wish to leave or join another network.
Facebook's response addressed each point in turn, defending the company's record on privacy and arguing that the changes it had already made were sufficient to address any outstanding privacy concerns.
"We do not use [user information] for ad targeting nor do we sell it to third parties," the Facebook letter read. "That information cannot be sold or shared with others or used in any way other than to improve the experience of Facebook users visiting their site."
The letter also pointed out that Facebook has reduced the amount of user information available to the public and given users all the tools they need to restrict their profile information to friends only.
Regarding the request for users to be able to export data to other social networks, Facebook argued that such a request was in itself a contradiction of the principles the privacy groups said they were aiming to protect.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
"We don't allow exporting of content that is created by others because it doesn't respect the decisions users make on Facebook," the letter added. "Frankly, we're surprised that these groups would advocate for a tool that would enable one person to strip all of the privacy protections for any information that has been shared with them."
Following up on the open letter, a post on the Facebook blog provided further clarity on the social networking site's efforts to simplify its privacy settings without compromising members' safety, addressing a number of common questions members had raised.
- 
What does modern security success look like for financial services?Sponsored As financial institutions grapple with evolving cyber threats, intensifying regulations, and the limitations of ageing IT infrastructure, the need for a resilient and forward-thinking security strategy has never been greater
 - 
Yes, legal AI. But what can you actually do with it? Let’s take a look…Sponsored Legal AI is a knowledge multiplier that can accelerate research, sharpen insights, and organize information, provided legal teams have confidence in its transparent and auditable application
 
- 
How to use LinkedIn to market yourself as an IT professionalwhitepaper Whether you’re updating your LinkedIn profile or creating one for the first time, it’s critical to remain consistent and credible if you hope to raise your profile within the IT industry
 - 
Meta to pay $725 million in Cambridge Analytica lawsuit settlementNews The settlement closes the long-running lawsuit into how Facebook's owner, Meta, handled the Cambridge Analytica scandal
 - 
Businesses to receive unique Twitter verification badge in platform overhaulNews There will be new verification systems for businesses, governments, and individuals - each receiving differently coloured checkmarks
 - 
Twitter could charge $20 a month for 'blue tick' verification, following Musk takeoverNews Developers have allegedly been given just seven days to implement the changes or face being fired
 - 
Meta's earnings are 'cause for concern' and 2023 looks even bleakerAnalysis Calls for investor faith in metaverse tech only emphasise the worries that its investment strategy won't pay off
 - 
Microsoft and Meta announce integration deal between Teams and WorkplaceNews Features from both business collaboration platforms will be available to users without having to switch apps
 - 
Facebook is shutting down its controversial facial recognition systemNews The move will see more than a billion facial templates removed from Facebook's records amid a push for more private applications of the technology
 - 
'Changing name to Meat': Industry reacts to Facebook's Meta rebrandNews The rebrand attempts to provide a clearer distinction between Facebook and its umbrella company