Two-thirds of workers are so fed up with ‘AI slop’ that they ‘feel nostalgic for pre-AI work’
A survey has revealed that dealing with low-quality 'AI slop' is making jobs feel less meaningful and more repetitive
Knowledge workers are secretly yearning for the good old days before AI entered the mix, with three-in-ten saying they preferred work before adoption of the technology.
In a survey of office workers by digital transformation firm Adaptavist, 65% said they preferred the pre-AI era and 38% would remove generative AI tools from the world entirely if they had the chance.
Younger workers in particular are among those most frustrated by AI, with 40% of Gen Z and Millennials saying they would scrap generative AI tools, compared with 32% of Gen X and 29% of Boomers.
The findings mark a shift in feelings about AI, the researchers said. While businesses continue to invest heavily in the technology, public concern is growing over its impact on jobs, workplace surveillance, privacy, and security.
Meanwhile, AI has introduced new pressures for workers, eroded the value of skilled work, and left employees feeling less engaged and less valued than before.
"These findings point to an underlying gap we see in most AI implementations," said Neal Riley, AI innovation lead at Adaptavist.
"It is much easier for organizations to focus on adoption metrics – who is using AI, how often they are using it – than it is to measure its impact on the work itself."
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2026 report - the leading resource for IT decision-maker insight on priorities and investment areas in AI, security and more.
Just over three-in-ten (31%) of the workers who said they'd like to get rid of AI said it was because they believed it reduces creativity. Almost as many had ethical doubts, with 29% citing concerns over misuse and 28% worrying about surveillance and privacy.
‘AI slop’ is a leading frustration
Notably, nearly half (46%) said that dealing with low-quality 'AI slop' makes their job feel less meaningful and more repetitive. More than one-third (37%), for example, admitted it has made them less engaged at work overall.
It's not as if workers are seeing the big efficiency benefits often associated with AI, the study found. More than four-in-ten (42%) now spend more time verifying and fact-checking AI output than they actually save by using it.
Almost half said that poor quality AI-generated work is actively slowing down their projects, while 55% believe it is reducing overall team efficiency.
The findings from Adaptavist align with recent research from ISC2, which found nearly two-thirds (65%) of cyber professionals are spending more time deciding whether to trust or act on AI-generated recommendations.
A similar number (63%) said they now find themselves reviewing and validating AI outputs, creating larger workloads and essentially wasting time on a daily basis.
‘AI slop’ has become a recurring buzzword over the last 18 months. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella penned a blog post in January this year calling on the industry to disregard the term.
Yet research shows this is having a direct impact on workplace efficiency and productivity. As ITPro reported in January, analysis from Zapier found employees are working an extra four and a half hours each week cleaning up mistakes.
The consequences of not acting on low quality AI-generated outputs can be grave, the study noted. Respondents reported having had work rejected due to poor AI outputs, while others highlighted customer complaints and even security incidents.
AI is adding pressure
Workers are also feeling pressured, with half believing that their performance is now being compared – fairly or not – to AI-generated output.
Around a quarter are facing intense pressure to improve performance, improve quality, and be more efficient, just to keep pace in a machine-accelerated environment.
Another quarter said they use AI simply to meet workload demands, and 23% rely on the technology to keep up with colleagues.
"By understanding the nature of the work and the different value streams across your business, you can more accurately measure outcomes and impact rather than simply counting actions," said Riley.
"When AI is introduced thoughtfully, with the right guardrails and genuine support for the people using it, it can enhance rather than erode what makes work meaningful and impactful."
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Follow ITPro on Google News and add us as a preferred source to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, views, and reviews.
You can also follow ITPro on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and BlueSky.
Emma Woollacott is a freelance journalist writing for publications including the BBC, Private Eye, Forbes, Raconteur and specialist technology titles.
-
The AI vulnerability flood: 7 critical takeaways from the Sophos Mythos expert briefingNavigating the shift from conversational AI to automated, long-running exploitation pipelines
-
MSI Modern MD342CQPW reviewReviews A good value ultrawide with USB-C connectivity, good image quality and a sensible design – the MSI Modern MD342CQPW is a good buy
-
How AI certification can help employees climb the career ladderIn depth Research shows that validating AI knowledge and skills can help to boost job mobility and salaries
-
AI minister secures cabinet seat as DSIT merged with new business departmentNews Industry stakeholders have welcomed the move as a sign of the government’s continued support for AI development
-
AI is changing team structures in cybersecurity and creating new roles – here are the jobs in hot demandNews SANS Institute notes that companies are reworking security teams and salaries are going up
-
Google DeepMind boss Demis Hassabis issues call to action on AI safety standardsNews The DeepMind co-founder has called for stronger safeguards to tackle AI risks
-
How Rathbones Asset Management built strong data foundationsCase study The firm worked with cloud-native data and AI firm, Snowflake, to turn data into insight that can drive smart decisions
-
Meta used a ‘constellation of internal artificial intelligence systems’ to target workers in recent layoffs, lawsuit claims – keystroke monitoring data, AI token usage, and performance ratings allegedly decided employee fatesNews Former Meta employees allege that an AI system used to select people for layoffs was biased
-
European SMBs are leading the way in AI execution – here's whyNews Small businesses in Europe are far more effective at operationalizing AI than North American counterparts
-
‘Give me three years, I’ll have hopefully enough AI savvy people’: Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora says it’s up to workers to adapt to AI – and that includes leadershipNews The Palo Alto Networks chief said the company doesn’t employ punitive measures when it comes to embracing AI, but it is pushing for a more ‘savvy’ workforce