Workers are wasting half a day each week fixing AI ‘workslop’
Better staff training and understanding of the technology is needed to cut down on AI workslop
AI 'workslop' is forcing employees to work an extra four and a half hours each week to clean up mistakes, according to new research.
A survey of more than 1,100 US enterprise AI users from Zapier found that while 92% of workers say AI boosts their productivity, the average employee spends more than half a workday revising, correcting - and sometimes completely redoing - AI-generated outputs.
Three-quarters of respondents reported at least one negative consequence from low-quality AI outputs, including work rejected by stakeholders (28%), security incidents (27%), and customer complaints (25%).
Zapier noted that just 2% of respondents don’t need to revise what AI produces.
A key factor here lies in poor training, researchers noted. Employees without AI training are six times more likely to say AI makes them less productive.
While untrained workers spend less time on AI cleanup, they also report fewer productivity gains: just 69% say AI helps, compared with 94% of trained workers.
“The productivity gains from AI are real. 92% of workers feel them. But so is the cleanup work,” said Emily Mabie, senior AI automation engineer at Zapier.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
“The companies seeing the best results aren't the ones avoiding AI. They're the ones who have invested in training, context, and orchestration tools that turn AI from a sloppy experiment into a managed process.”
The worst AI workslop offenders
Data analysis tops the workslop list, according to Zapier, with 55% saying data analysis and visualization projects require the most cleanup, followed by writing tasks at 46%.
Meanwhile, engineering, IT, and data roles average five hours per week fixing AI outputs, with 78% reporting negative consequences. Finance and accounting teams face the highest rate of negative consequences at 85%, averaging 4.6 hours of cleanup per week.
The time lost in fixing AI-generated outputs has a significant impact on bottom lines, according to Zapier. Workers spending more than five hours a week on AI cleanup tasks are more than twice as likely to report lost revenue, clients, or deals.
Zapier said better data quality and more robust infrastructure could go a long way in helping to improve the situation.
The study found that those with access to AI orchestration tools and comprehensive company context – so internal documentation, brand guides, project templates, or prompt libraries – said the technology does have a big positive impact on productivity.
“The solution isn’t fewer tools, it’s better infrastructure,” said Mabie. “Orchestration, training, and proper context convert AI from a vague experiment into a managed process where the extra cleanup is the cost of doing more meaningful work faster, rather than the cost of pretending you are.”
AI workslop is here to stay
The rise of AI workslop has become a recurring pain point for enterprises ramping up adoption of the technology.
A report from MIT researchers last year found that more than 40% of US-based workers had been given AI-generated content that “masquerades as good work but lacks the substance to meaningfully advance a given task”.
This, the study noted, was destroying productivity and harming perception of the technology in the workplace.
Certain professions are experiencing acute issues with this trend, such as those working in software development. A recent study from CodeRabbit, for example, shows that AI makes 1.7 times as many mistakes as human programmers.
The use of AI in software development has been one of the leading use-cases for the technology over the last three years, with developers reporting significant productivity boosts from AI code generation.
Research from Harness in early 2025, however, found that these productivity gains are offset by the fact developers are having to drop tools and manually remediate faulty code, slowing down processes.
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
You can also follow ITPro on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and BlueSky.
Emma Woollacott is a freelance journalist writing for publications including the BBC, Private Eye, Forbes, Raconteur and specialist technology titles.
-
What businesses need to know about the update to Cyber EssentialsIn-depth Cyber Essentials was updated this April – what are the key changes?
-
Two US nationals sentenced for role in prolific fake worker laptop farmsNews The Americans were raising money for the North Korean regime by allowing fake IT workers to appear as legitimate US-based employees
-
Microsoft joins competitors in handing over AI models for advanced testingNews US and UK government agencies will evaluate the firm's frontier models, along with those from Google and xAI
-
AI adoption is accelerating in the UK, but ‘trust is not keeping pace’News Organizations need to do more to reassure customers over governance
-
Liz Kendall: The UK is in prime position to become a global leader in AI — but greater tech industry support is needed to avoid falling behindNews Tech secretary Liz Kendall has pledged greater investment in the chip and semiconductor technologies that underpin AI
-
UK firms accelerate ‘sovereign AI’ plans amid concerns over dependence on overseas techNews A Red Hat report shows firms are prioritizing sovereign AI over fears that foreign providers could restrict access
-
UK organizations are failing to move past basic AI use-casesNews Businesses in the UK are ramping up AI adoption, but they’re falling at key hurdles
-
‘AI is not making IT simpler – it's making it more consequential’: IT workers are feeling the heat as AI raises expectationsNews A SolarWinds survey suggests AI makes IT work more strategic, but also adds friction and raises expectations
-
AI adoption rates aren’t matching IT hypeNews The appetite for AI is there, but a range of issues are hampering adoption
-
Concerns are mounting over the cognitive impact of AI as workers report experiencing ‘brain fry’ – and it’s causing "increased employee errors, decision fatigue, and intention to quit"News Research from Boston Consulting Group backs earlier studies in highlighting the negative cognitive impact of AI at work
