Enterprises keep cutting staff for AI — and they keep regretting it
Gartner research shows many companies are reducing headcount due to AI, but it’s not all it’s cut out to be
Eight-in-ten companies using automation tools are cutting staff numbers, but even with layoffs they're not necessarily seeing any return on investment (ROI).
That's according to new research by Gartner, which surveyed 350 companies with at least $1 billion in annual revenue that had rolled out or were piloting autonomous business capabilities – be it AI agents, intelligent automation, or robotic process automation (RPA).
The poll found 80% of those using autonomous tools had cut staff, but weren’t unlocking the level of returns they were expecting.
"Many CEOs turn to layoffs to demonstrate quick AI returns; however, this disposition is misplaced," said Helen Poitevin, Distinguished VP Analyst at Gartner. "Workforce reductions may create budget room, but they do not create return."
"Organizations that improve ROI are not those that eliminate the need for people, but those that amplify them by aggressively investing more in skills, roles and operating models that allow humans to guide and scale autonomous systems."
Despite AI and other forms of automation not delivering any ROI as yet, Gartner still forecasts that spending will increase for AI agents.
The consultancy predicted that AI agent spending would more than double from $86.4bn in 2025 to $206.6bn this year, continuing to climb to $376.3bn next year.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
Similarly, despite the vast majority of polled companies saying they were cutting back on their workforce, Gartner also predicted that autonomy would increase the need for people.
By 2028, the consultancy predicts that autonomous business tools would be a "net-positive job creator" thanks to the creation of "new forms of work that AI cannot absorb."
"Long term, autonomous business will create more work for humans, not less. Lasting structural factors such as demographic decline and high-stakes, trust-dependent consumer moments will ensure human talent remains central to running, governing and scaling autonomous business," said Poitevin.
That echoes a previous Gartner report that last year predicted AI won't create a "jobs apocalypse" but there would be disruption as 32 million jobs a year will need to be "reconfigured, redesigned or fused."
Executive regrets are mounting
The research from Gartner tracks with a series of studies over the last 18 months highlighting a rash approach to AI and automation – and one that many businesses have come to regret.
A survey of UK tech leaders last year showed a third had cut staff in favour of AI, but later regretted making those redundancies. Separate research from Forrester suggested that the trend of AI-related layoffs could eventually result in a wave of offshoring, with enterprises that have cut staff trying to claw back talent.
Leading figures in the tech industry, including those in the AI space, have also hit out at the current trend of layoffs. Earlier this year, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman suggested that companies engaging in these practices are “AI washing” and blaming the technology for cuts caused by other factors.
Altman’s comments were backed up by an Oxford Economics study that said claims of AI disrupting work had “patchy” evidence at best.
"While a rising number of firms are pinning job losses on AI, other more traditional drivers of job layoffs are far more commonly cited,” the report stated. “What's more, we suspect some firms are trying to dress up layoffs as a good news story rather than bad news, such as past over-hiring."
Plenty of job losses attributed to AI aren't because the technology can do their jobs, but instead redundancies are being used to pay for the initial investment in AI with the hope it pays off in the end.
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Follow ITPro on Google News and add us as a preferred source to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, views, and reviews.
You can also follow ITPro on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and BlueSky.
Freelance journalist Nicole Kobie first started writing for ITPro in 2007, with bylines in New Scientist, Wired, PC Pro and many more.
Nicole the author of a book about the history of technology, The Long History of the Future.
-
Business leaders are using AI as a “license to reduce headcount” – new Morgan Stanley research lays bare the impact on UK workersNews Analysis of five sectors highlights an "early warning sign" of AI’s impact on jobs
-
A new study claims AI will destroy 10.4 million roles in the US by 2030, more than the number of jobs lost in the Great Recession – but analysts still insist there won’t be a ‘jobs apocalypse’News A frantic push to automate roles with AI could come back to haunt many enterprises, according to Forrester
-
Businesses aren't laying off staff because of AI, they're using it as an excuse to distract from 'weak demand or excessive hiring'News It's sexier to say AI caused redundancies than it is to admit the economy is bad or overhiring has happened
-
'This acquisition was the worst thing for us': Synopsys staff brace for layoffs following Ansys mergerNews The $35bn deal has sparked a restructuring that will see 10% of jobs lost
-
IBM layoffs loom as ‘single-digit percentage’ of global workforce set for cutsNews Headcount at the cloud giant has been decreasing steadily in recent years
-
Analysts warn AI layoffs could spark a new wave of offshoring – enterprises are rehiring after workforce cuts, but either outsourcing or at lower rates of payNews Analysts expect a wave of rehiring next year in the wake of AI layoffs. That may sound like good news for workers, but it'll probably involve offshoring or outsourcing.
-
Amazon is cutting 14,000 roles in a bid to ‘operate like the world's largest startup’News The layoffs at Amazon mark the latest in a string of cuts in recent years
-
Oracle layoffs loom despite strong financial resultsNews Hundreds of staff across US and elsewhere say they've been made redundant


