IT Pro is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more

Ohio lawmakers look to outlaw municipal broadband

If passed, Ohio would be the first state in a decade to enact such a law

Ethernet cable with lights shooting from the end

Ohio’s state legislature is close to passing a new law that would ban municipal broadband networks over the vast majority of the state. Ohio cities that already have public broadband networks vow to fight the ban.

Nationwide, 17 states have laws restricting municipal broadband, benefiting internet service providers that would rather not compete with publicly owned broadband networks. Until recently, the count was 19 states, but Arkansas and Washington recently ended those restrictions.

In Ohio, the proposed law would kill over 30 existing municipal broadband networks, according to reports. Ohio would be the first state in a decade to pass such a law.

Ohio’s Republican-controlled Senate passed the anti-municipal broadband measure, which was included in a Senate budget bill, last week on a party-line vote. It remains to be seen if the bill survives upcoming budget negotiations in the state’s Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

A law firm concluded the bill would outlaw municipal broadband across 98% of the state, allowing cities and towns to provide broadband only to “unserved areas,” which it defines as places that don’t have access to download speeds of at least 10Mbps. Critics of the bill say a 10Mbps standard is low, as many DSL lines offer that speed.

The bill would also forbid cities and towns from offering broadband service outside their municipal borders, even if the area in question is “unserved.”

Charter, the US’ second-biggest broadband provider after Comcast, covers most of Ohio. Cable and telecom companies AT&T, Comcast, Frontier, and WOW also have broadband networks in the state.

Meanwhile, Ohio cities that operate broadband networks are preparing to challenge the ban in court.

“It is just a transparent attack on municipalities and our efforts to extend broadband services for those who need it the most at a time when we need it the most,” said Cleveland City Council President Kevin Kelley, according to Cleveland.com. “It is absolutely irresponsible legislating. It is done as a favor to the legacy carriers, and we’re going to do everything we can to fight it.”

Featured Resources

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Turbonomic Application Resource Management for IBM Cloud® Paks

Business benefits and cost savings enabled by IBM Turbonomic Application Resource Management

Free Download

The Total Economic Impact™ of IBM Watson Assistant

Cost savings and business benefits enabled by Watson Assistant

Free Download

The field guide to application modernisation

Moving forward with your enterprise application portfolio

Free Download

AI for customer service

Discover the industry-leading AI platform that customers and employees want to use

Free Download

Recommended

Static IP vs dynamic IP: What’s the difference?
Network & Internet

Static IP vs dynamic IP: What’s the difference?

27 Jul 2022
UK-based OneWeb and French Eutelsat officially discussing major merger
business transformation

UK-based OneWeb and French Eutelsat officially discussing major merger

25 Jul 2022
HTTP vs HTTPS: What difference does it make to security?
Network & Internet

HTTP vs HTTPS: What difference does it make to security?

20 Jul 2022
SpaceX given FCC nod to provide Starlink Wi-Fi to moving vehicles
Network & Internet

SpaceX given FCC nod to provide Starlink Wi-Fi to moving vehicles

1 Jul 2022

Most Popular

UK water supplier confirms hack by Cl0p ransomware gang
ransomware

UK water supplier confirms hack by Cl0p ransomware gang

16 Aug 2022
Why convenience is the biggest threat to your security
Sponsored

Why convenience is the biggest threat to your security

8 Aug 2022
How to boot Windows 11 in Safe Mode
Microsoft Windows

How to boot Windows 11 in Safe Mode

29 Jul 2022