F-Secure SAFE review: A mediocre suite with no killer features
It’s nice to look at and not too expensive, but SAFE is neither particularly fast nor particularly effective
The F-Secure SAFE interface is clean and clear – and the suite itself certainly isn’t cluttered with features. Naturally, it’ll watch for viruses, and carry out on-demand scans, but there’s little in the way of secondary functions to discover.
To some extent, this is because the important stuff is taking place behind the scenes. F-Secure doesn’t transfer your sensitive transactions into a separate browser, but it does install extensions for Chrome and Firefox aimed at doing a similar job. It even detects when you’re connected to a payment or banking site and locks down all other network traffic, so snoopers can’t capture your details.
Similarly, while SAFE doesn’t make a song and dance about its anti-ransomware feature, it’s there in the background, blocking untrusted access to your personal folders. But it only does the same as the Protected Folders feature built into Windows 10, which feels a little superfluous.
There’s not much imagination on display on the Tools page, either. “App and file control” merely lets you browse files that have been blocked, quarantined or protected, while the website control window lets you enter URLs to blacklist and whitelist for the current user – hardly a feature we’ve been crying out for. The Firewall icon modestly takes you to Windows’ native firewall settings.
The most ambitious part of SAFE is its parental controls, which let you apply daily time limits and web filtering for Windows devices, plus app restrictions and location tracking on Android and iOS. It’s a nice system, and centrally managed from a friendly web portal: installing the software on a child’s laptop and phone will eat up two of your three licences, but if need be you can find a five-device edition online for a very reasonable £22.50.
A bigger issue is performance. AV-Comparatives found that F-Secure SAFE neutralised only 99.3% of threats, which is a little on the low side – and in the same lab’s false-positive test it blocked 25 harmless programs and websites, a tally that only beats Windows Defender.
In its tests, AV-Comparatives also found that F-Secure measurably slowed down both file copies and downloads, which resulted in a performance rating far behind the likes of Eset and Kaspersky. So, in the absence of a killer feature, F-Secure SAFE emerges as a mediocre suite that doesn’t distinguish itself in any particular way.
In This Article
- 1Keep yourself protected with our list of the best security suites
- 2Bitdefender Internet Security 2020 review: One of the most effective security suites around
- 3Avast Free Antivirus review: Pushy but protective
- 4Kaspersky Internet Security 2020 review: Fast, cheap and accurate
- 5Norton 360 Deluxe review: Stands out from the crowd
- 6Windows Defender review: An average default option
- 7BullGuard Internet Security review: Cheap, but not necessarily good value
- 8Avira Antivirus Pro review: Too costly to justify
- 9Eset Internet Security review: Hard to recommend
- 10G Data Internet Security review: In case of emergency, avoid
- 11Panda Free Antivirus review: A very tempting AV option
- 12Trend Micro Internet Security review: An unexpected stumble
What 2023 will mean for the industry
What do most IT decision makers really think will be the important trends and challenges in the coming year?Free Download
2022 Magic quadrant for Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
SIEM is evolving into a security platform with multiple features and deployment modelsFree Download
IDC MarketScape: Worldwide unified endpoint management services
2022 vendor assessmentFree Download
Magic quadrant for application performance monitoring and observability
Enabling continuous updating of diverse & dynamic application environmentsView Now