Developers say AI can code better than most humans – but there's a catch
A new survey suggests AI coding tools are catching up on human capabilities
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
AI is better at coding than most humans, according to software developers, but there are several glaring issues holding the technology back.
A survey by Clutch revealed that more than half (53%) of senior software developers believe large language models (LLMSs) can already code better than most humans.
The study comes as AI tools continue to push into software development, with solutions like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Windsurf, which OpenAI tried to snap up for $3bn in May before losing out to Cognition.
Given that, it's no surprise that three-quarters of those asked by Clutch said they expect AI to "significantly reshape" how software is developed over the next five years.
"That shift is already underway," the company said in a blog post detailing its findings.
"From the rise of prompt engineering to debates about AI-generated code quality, software leaders are grappling with rapidly evolving development models and updating their hiring, upskilling, and automation strategies to keep up."
According to the survey, 78% of those asked said they already use AI several times a week or more — that matches near enough to a recent survey from Stack Overflow that suggested 84% of developers were using, or plan to use, AI in their daily workflows.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
That use of AI doesn't necessarily bother developers, with 42% reporting positive feelings about AI and another 23% saying they were "excited" by the technology.
Concerns about AI
But it's not all good news, the survey noted. One-in-ten reported concerns about how AI is used in software development with 8% skeptical about the technology.
The top concern was data privacy (24%), followed by job displacement (14%), the risk of errors in work (14%), and the loss of creativity (13%).
A further 7% raised the issue of a lack of entry-level roles to help junior developers join the industry. The impact on developers entering the workforce has become a key talking point in recent months, with industry stakeholders suggesting the technology could seriously hamper opportunities for graduates.
"When asked how AI might affect entry into the profession, opinions were mixed," Clutch noted in the blog post.
"45% of respondents said AI might actually lower the barrier for junior developers by giving them better tools and faster ways to learn. But 37% said it would do the opposite, making it harder for newcomers to compete or even get noticed. AI's ability to automate junior-level work is reshaping hiring criteria."
Beyond that, 79% believe that AI skills will soon become a must-have to get hired.
How developers are using AI
How AI is being used varies, according to Clutch. The survey found that 48% of developers use AI primarily for code generation, with 36% using it in testing phases and a further 36% during code review.
A minority of developers also use AI earlier in the development cycle for requirement gathering and system design, or even post-launch for debugging.
"These stages demand speed, consistency, and pattern recognition, which makes them a natural fit for automation," the post noted.
But Clutch argues it's not just about automation - the technology is enabling development teams to overhaul traditional processes and find new ways of working.
"It’s not just about doing the same tasks faster,” Clutch noted. “It’s about doing them differently, with new methods for debugging, testing, and prototyping that weren’t practical before."
One area of concern highlighted in the survey centered around AI-generated code. A host of major tech companies, including Microsoft and Google, have touted their own gains on this front in recent months.
More than half (59%) of respondents said they used AI-generated code without fully understanding it, for example. This, the study noted, could create new security risks for organizations.
In a study last year, researchers warned that generative AI could replicate insecure code. A more recent study from Cloudsmith also warned that development teams are walking into a trap with AI-generated code, with many placing too much faith in the technology.
"That gap between speed and understanding is something teams will need to work on," Clutch noted.
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
MORE FROM ITPRO
- AI coding tools aren’t the solution to the unfolding 'developer crisis’
- AI is finally delivering results for software developers
- Developers in this one country are the most frequent users of AI coding tools
Freelance journalist Nicole Kobie first started writing for ITPro in 2007, with bylines in New Scientist, Wired, PC Pro and many more.
Nicole the author of a book about the history of technology, The Long History of the Future.
-
Salesforce targets telco gains with new agentic AI toolsNews Telecoms operators can draw on an array of pre-built agents to automate and streamline tasks
-
Four national compute resources launched for cutting-edge science and researchNews The new national compute centers will receive a total of £76 million in funding
-
Claude Code flaws left AI tool wide open to hackers – here’s what developers need to knowNews The trio of Claude code flaws could have put developers at risk of attacks
-
AI isn’t killing DevOps, you’re just using it wrongNews New research indicates that enterprises with mature DevOps processes are gaining the most from AI adoption
-
Anthropic says Claude Code can help streamline 'cost-prohibitive' COBOL modernization, but IBM says it's not that simple – 'decades of hardware-software integration cannot be replicated by moving code'News Research from Anthropic claims Claude Code can simplify modernization of COBOL systems
-
‘AI is making us able to develop software at the speed of light’: Mistral CEO Arthur Mensch thinks 50% of SaaS solutions could be supplanted by AINews Mensch’s comments come amidst rising concerns about the impact of AI on traditional software
-
Automated code reviews are coming to Google's Gemini CLI Conductor extension – here's what users need to knowNews A new feature in the Gemini CLI extension looks to improve code quality through verification
-
Claude Code creator Boris Cherny says software engineers are 'more important than ever’ as AI transforms the profession – but Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei still thinks full automation is comingNews There’s still plenty of room for software engineers in the age of AI, at least for now
-
Anthropic Labs chief Mike Krieger claims Claude is essentially writing itself – and it validates a bold prediction by CEO Dario AmodeiNews Internal teams at Anthropic are supercharging production and shoring up code security with Claude, claims executive
-
AI-generated code is fast becoming the biggest enterprise security risk as teams struggle with the ‘illusion of correctness’News Security teams are scrambling to catch AI-generated flaws that appear correct before disaster strikes
