A torrent of AI slop submissions forced an open source project to scrap its bug bounty program – maintainer claims they’re removing the “incentive for people to submit crap”
Curl isn’t the only open source project inundated with AI slop submissions
A bug bounty program run by a popular open source data transfer service has been shut down amidst an onslaught of AI-generated ‘slop’ contributions.
Daniel Stenberg, lead maintainer of Curl, a command line interface (CLI) tool which allows developers to transfer data, confirmed the decision to shut down the bug bounty scheme in a GitHub commit last week.
In a subsequent email outlining the move, Stenberg revealed seven bug bounty submissions were recorded within a sixteen hour period, with 20 logged since the beginning of the year.
Although some of these uncovered bugs, not a single one actually detailed a concrete vulnerability.
“Some of them were true and proper bugs, and taking care of this lot took a good while,” he said. “Eventually we concluded that none of them identified a vulnerability and we now count twenty submissions done already in 2026.”
Stenberg added that the current volume of submissions is placing a “high load” on the security team, and the decision to shut down the program aims to “reduce the noise” and number of AI-generated reports.
“The main goal with shutting down the bounty is to remove the incentive for people to submit crap and non-well researched reports to us,” he wrote.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
“We believe, hope really, that we still will get actual security vulnerabilities reported to use even if we do not pay for them. The future will tell.”
cURL maintainer names and shames bug hunter
Stenberg revealed he had a “lengthy discussion” with an individual who submitted one of the AI-generated vulnerability reports after publicly ridiculing them on social media site Mastodon.
“It was useful for me to make me remember that oftentimes these people are just ordinary mislead humans and they might actually learn from this and perhaps even change,” he said.
The individual in question, however, insists their professional life has been “ruined”.
According to Stenberg, the naming and shaming approach appears to be the only option for cutting down on this growing issue.
“This is a balance of course, but I also continue to believe that exposing, discussing, and ridiculing the ones who waste our time is one of the better ways to get the message through: you should NEVER report a bug or vulnerability unless you understand it - and can reproduce it.”
AI slop reports are a major headache
This isn’t Stenberg’s first run-in with this topic. In January 2024, he aired previous concerns over the growing volume of poor reports. A key talking point here lay around the fact that these appeared legitimate and maintainers wasted time dissecting slop.
"When reports are made to look better and to appear to have a point, it takes a longer time for us to research and eventually discard it. Every security report has to have a human spend time to look at it and assess what it means," he said.
Curl isn’t alone in contending with AI-generated ‘slop’ security reports, either. As ITPro reported in December 2024, another open source maintainer lamented over the strain placed on open source developers and maintainers.
Seth Larson, a security report triage worker for a handful of open source projects, revealed they were facing an “uptick in extremely low-quality, spammy, and LLM-hallucinated security reports” to open source projects.
This torrent of AI-generated slop was having a huge impact on open source maintainers, wasting time and effort, and leading to higher levels of burnout. As with Stenberg, Larson noted that these seemingly legitimate reports were becoming a major headache.
“The issue is in the age of LLMs, these reports appear at first glance to be potentially legitimate and thus require time to refute,” he wrote in a blog post.
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
You can also follow ITPro on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and BlueSky.

Ross Kelly is ITPro's News & Analysis Editor, responsible for leading the brand's news output and in-depth reporting on the latest stories from across the business technology landscape. Ross was previously a Staff Writer, during which time he developed a keen interest in cyber security, business leadership, and emerging technologies.
He graduated from Edinburgh Napier University in 2016 with a BA (Hons) in Journalism, and joined ITPro in 2022 after four years working in technology conference research.
For news pitches, you can contact Ross at ross.kelly@futurenet.com, or on Twitter and LinkedIn.
-
Sam Altman pours cold water on AI 'jobs apocalypse' concernsNews OpenAI CEO Sam Altman “thought there would have been more impact” on white collar and entry-level jobs at this point
-
Everything you need to know about Euro-OfficeNews Euro-Office offers a sovereign European rival to Microsoft Office and Google Docs
-
AWS CEO Matt Garman is bullish on the future of SaaS — Amazon Quick shows there’s a ‘great business opportunity’ with AI-powered softwareNews Matt Garman said fears over the ‘SaaSpocalypse’ were overblown in February, now AWS is making big moves in the SaaS space
-
AI is coming to Ubuntu: Canonical exec teases future AI features and agentic workflow capabilities for version 26.10 — but on a ‘strictly opt-in basis’News A range of new AI features are coming to Ubuntu over the next year, according to maintainers, but only providing they’re of “sufficient maturity and quality”.
-
Compromised open source package pushed malicious Elementary CLI release to developersNews The open source Elementary CLI tool has more than one million monthly downloads
-
Everything you need to know about the GitHub Copilot pricing changesNews GitHub Copilot pricing changes mean users will be charged based on consumption, rather than a set number of credits
-
Developers are slacking on AI-generated code safety – here's why it could come back to haunt themNews While organizations are aware of the risks, many are spending little time or effort on tracking artifact versions, origins, and security attestations
-
Four things you need to know about GitHub's AI model training policy – including how to opt outNews Users of certain GitHub Copilot plans will have interaction data used to train AI models, but can opt out
-
'AI doesn't solve the burnout problem. If anything, it amplifies it': AI coding tools might supercharge software development, but working at 'machine speed' has a big impact on developersNews Developers using AI coding tools are shipping products faster, but velocity is creating cracks across the delivery pipeline
-
‘I hope there's a world where AI is is complementary to humans’: Workday CEO vows to support HR workers as Sana integration automates more processes than ever beforeNews Sana from Workday seeks to bring agentic AI to Workday’s systems and beyond with natural language input and third-party connectors