Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and members of the social network's board have been sued by a shareholder who is unhappy with them being able to awarded each other up to $150 million of stock annually.
Ernesto Espinoza said the board was "essentially free to grant itself whatever amount of compensation it chooses" under the social media company's 2012 equity incentive plan, which also covers employees, officers and consultants.
Zuckerberg made $653,165 last year, but according to Forbes his net worth is $27.7 billion. Among the other defendants is Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg, a director whose compensation was $16.15 million in 2013 is worth $999 million, according to Forbes.
The lawsuit alleges breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment.
The shareholder wants to force directors to repay Facebook for alleged damages sustained and to impose "meaningful limits" subject to shareholder approval about how much stock the board can award itself.
The plan annually caps total awards at 25 million shares and individual awards at 2.5 million. In theory lets the board annually award directors $156 million in stock each, based on Friday's closing price of $62.50.
The lawsuit does not contend that such large sums will be awarded.
Espinoza also said last year's average $461,000 payout to non-employee directors was too high, being 43 percent larger than typical payouts at "peer" companies such as Amazon.com and Walt Disney that on average generated twice as much revenue and three times more profit.
Facebook spokeswoman Genevieve Grdina said "the lawsuit is without merit and we will defend ourselves vigorously," in an email to Reuters.
-
Researchers claim Salt Typhoon masterminds learned their trade at Cisco Network AcademyNews The Salt Typhoon hacker group has targeted telecoms operators and US National Guard networks in recent years
-
HPE says unified channel strategy won't force Juniper partners to generalizeNews Does the company embrace specialists or want a full portfolio push? The answer, it seems, is both
-
What can AI do to empower those working in the legal sector today, tomorrow, and beyond?Supported AI is transforming the legal profession — from streamlining today’s workflows to shaping tomorrow’s strategies. For firms, the choice is clear: embrace trusted AI tools now or risk falling behind in a rapidly evolving landscape
-
AI in the legal sector: How to separate the signal from the noiseSupported From contract review to litigation strategy, AI promises efficiency. But with so much noise in the market, legal professionals must know how to spot tools that deliver real value
-
How AI can help rather than hinder knowledge workers in the legal professionSupported AI won’t replace lawyers — it empowers them. Free from routine tasks, legal pros can focus on strategy, judgment, and client success
-
AI legal confidence: What is it and how do you get there?Supported AI is reshaping legal practice, but doing so successfully comes down to building trust and confidence...
-
Legal professionals face huge risks when using AI at workAnalysis Legal professionals at a US law firm have been sanctioned over their use of AI after it was found to have created fake case law.
-
Meta to pay $725 million in Cambridge Analytica lawsuit settlementNews The settlement closes the long-running lawsuit into how Facebook's owner, Meta, handled the Cambridge Analytica scandal
-
Meta's earnings are 'cause for concern' and 2023 looks even bleakerAnalysis Calls for investor faith in metaverse tech only emphasise the worries that its investment strategy won't pay off
-
Microsoft and Meta announce integration deal between Teams and WorkplaceNews Features from both business collaboration platforms will be available to users without having to switch apps
