OpenAI turns to red teamers to prevent malicious ChatGPT use as company warns future models could pose 'high' security risk
The ChatGPT maker wants to keep defenders ahead of attackers when it comes to AI security tools
OpenAI says its future AI models could create serious cybersecurity risks – so it's taking drastic action to crack down on malicious use.
The ChatGPT developer has previously detailed attempts by criminals to use its AI models to automate malware campaigns, banning accounts with suspicious activity.
Now, it plans to boost its efforts to avoid AI models being used in cyber attacks by training models to avoid malicious use, hiring red teaming organizations to test systems, and setting up a trusted partner system so only known groups can access the latest models for security purposes.
In addition, the company said its agentic security researcher Aardvark was now in private beta.
"Cyber capabilities in AI models are advancing rapidly, bringing meaningful benefits for cyber defense as well as new dual-use risks that must be managed carefully," the company said in a blog post.
Using one benchmark, GPT-5 scored 27% on a capture the flag challenge, but just a few months later GPT-5.1-Codex-Max scored 76%, OpenAI said. The company expects upcoming models will “continue on this trajectory."
Because of that, OpenAI said it was planning for each model as though it would reach "high levels of cybersecurity capability."
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2026 report - the leading resource for IT decision-maker insight on priorities and investment areas in AI, security and more.
"By this, we mean models that can either develop working zero-day remote exploits against well-defended systems, or meaningfully assist with complex, stealthy enterprise or industrial intrusion operations aimed at real-world effects," the post added.
Warnings over the use of AI among cyber criminals have been growing in recent months as threat groups increasingly flock to powerful new tools to supercharge attacks.
Last month, for example, Google said it spotted malware that used AI to adapt to its environment mid-attack, while security researchers in August spotted a ransomware strain that made use of an OpenAI model.
More recently, TrendMicro has spotted criminals using intelligence reports as input to "vibe code" malware, while NetScout has warned that attackers are already using AI chatbots for DDoS attacks.
Jon Abbott, co-founder and CEO of ThreatAware, noted: "With models that can develop working zero-day remote exploits or assist with complex, stealthy intrusions, the barrier to entry for criminals has been dramatically lowered."
OpenAI is fighting back
The first step to battling growing risks is ensuring its models are useful for defensive security by helping cyber professionals with code auditing and bug spotting.
"Our goal is for our models and products to bring significant advantages for defenders, who are often outnumbered and under-resourced," OpenAI said.
However, such tools are also useful for the other side, OpenAI admitted, so it's building in a range of safeguards to help avoid their use by criminals.
"At the foundation of this, we take a defense-in-depth approach, relying on a combination of access controls, infrastructure hardening, egress controls, and monitoring," the post added.
"We complement these measures with detection and response systems, and dedicated threat intelligence and insider-risk programs, making it so emerging threats are identified and blocked quickly."
In practice, that means training models to refuse harmful requests, while still allowing what it calls "educational use cases", as well as bolstering detection systems, including blocking outputs that could be used for malicious purposes, with automatic and human-led review for enforcement.
OpenAI’s work with red teamers will also help spot flaws in the system, the company noted, and will play a key role in mitigating future issues.
"Their job is to try to bypass all of our defenses by working end-to-end, just like a determined and well-resourced adversary might," the post noted.
Future plans
OpenAI also announced a "trusted access program" for partners and known customers in security, offering access to the latest models and enhanced features. However, the company said it was still working on the "right boundary" between broad access for some capabilities versus which ones should fall behind such restrictions.
Aardvark, OpenAI's agentic security tool, is now in private beta. The AI tool can look for vulnerabilities and suggest patches, and OpenAI said it had already spotted novel flaws in open-source software.
The company said it would make Aardvark free to some non-commercial open source projects to help boost security of their ecosystems and supply chain.
Beyond that, the company revealed it will establish a Frontier Risk Council, an advisory body to keep a close watch on these issues in its own models, and would work with other AI developers via the Frontier Model Forum, a non-profit that works with labs on threat models.
"Taken together, this is ongoing work, and we expect to keep evolving these programs as we learn what most effectively advances real-world security," the company added.
In the meantime, ThreatAware's Abbott warned that the best way for businesses to battle the increasing security threat sparked by AI is to focus on the basics like user awareness, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and security controls.
“OpenAI’s warning that new models pose ‘high’ cybersecurity risks is exactly why getting the security foundations right is absolutely critical," he said. "AI might be accelerating the pace of attacks, but our best defence will continue to be nailing the fundamentals first."
He added: "Failing to address the basics should be a far greater concern, and there’s little point trying to implement advanced solutions if they’re not in place.”
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
MORE FROM ITPRO
Freelance journalist Nicole Kobie first started writing for ITPro in 2007, with bylines in New Scientist, Wired, PC Pro and many more.
Nicole the author of a book about the history of technology, The Long History of the Future.
-
How to lower your AI costs: 3 ways the NVIDIA-powered Dell Pro Max with GB10 and GB300 offer an alternative to token-maxxingSponsored Local AI capabilities through the Dell Pro Max series could be the key to tackling surging token consumption rates
-
Clunky workplace tech is ruining meetings and impacting productivityNews It's not just you: IT leaders say valuable time is being lost every week
-
OpenAI says some researchers are blowing through $7,000 in AI tokens every day – but it’s a price the company appears willing to payNews OpenAI has revealed that researchers now spend around $600 each day on AI tokens amidst a surge in agentic coding. Some, meanwhile, are using upwards of $7,000 worth of tokens per day.
-
Six things OpenAI learned about AI from the Hugging Face incidentNews OpenAI's report into AI going rogue reveals efforts at cheating and communicating — but also some well-behaved bots
-
“Enterprises are becoming much more rigorous about the economics of AI”: Snowflake wants to help you cut AI costs by choosing the right model for the right taskNews New dynamic model routing capabilities aim to help customers box clever when it comes to their AI model choice
-
OpenAI forges closer ties with IBM in enterprise pushNews The duo will combine OpenAI models and products with IBM Consulting expertise
-
Can AI fight AI? Where the security gap still exists in cybersecurity, and how MSPs can help.Industry Insights Why AI security is failing and how MSPs can close the gap
-
Microsoft has joined the growing list of companies cracking down on ‘tokenmaxxing’News The company is updating internal guidance to reduce rising costs
-
AI testing firm Irregular the source of ‘misconfigurations’ that led to Meta, OpenAI, and Anthropic AI incidentsNews The “frontier security lab” has been referenced in multiple cyber incident statements
-
After OpenAI-Hugging Face, how do IT leaders need to change the way they think about AI?In depth The OpenAI-Hugging Face incident and Anthropic admission soon after have opened up new conversations about controls around AI. How should IT leaders change their thinking about the technology?