Productivity gains, strong financial returns, but no job losses – three things investors want from generative AI
A PwC survey of investors reveals expectations for productivity and financial gains, but also workforce investment


Investors are making it clear what they want from generative AI: solid financial and productivity returns, but no job cuts.
That's according to a survey of AI investors by PwC, which found three-quarters of respondents believed generative AI would be beneficial for the companies they've backed.
And six-in-ten investors polled said they expect not only revenue growth but also increased profitability, suggesting a close eye on the costs of AI.
The findings come amid concerns about the high costs of developing and deploying AI – and perhaps slower than hoped for returns on investment (ROI) for some companies.
Indeed, Microsoft said last summer it could take 15 years for its own investments in AI to pay off, but also suggested its customers could expect an ROI of $3.70 for every dollar spent, with further research suggesting AI investment was starting to show real returns.
"Generative AI has been a game changer for businesses worldwide, but investors now expect it to deliver real, measurable value," said Albertha Charles, asset & wealth management leader at PwC UK.
The survey examined AI's biggest opportunities in helping to scale businesses, measuring return on investment – something executives have struggled with – as well as shaping stakeholder perception, and enhancing workforce impact.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
Generative AI gains require workforce investment
However, while 70% of investors said they'd like businesses to get on with deploying AI at scale, even more, some 77%, said that upskilling the workforce was more important, suggesting a view that investors want to see automation in addition to well-trained staff.
"They understand that success isn’t just about technology – it requires investment in people and new ways of working," Charles said.
"As AI adoption accelerates, investors will be watching closely to see how leaders balance technology with upskilling their workforce to unlock meaningful gains in profit and productivity."
That comes amid wider fears of the negative impact of AI on jobs, fueled by companies such as Salesforce and Workday, among others, attributing redundancies to a pivot to AI.
Research suggests upskilling workers is the only way to avert an AI job loss apocalypse – and PwC's survey suggests at least three-quarters of investors are onside with that.
Regulatory pressure
The survey revealed investors saw macroeconomic volatility, geopolitical conflict, and cybersecurity as the biggest risks facing businesses.
RELATED WHITEPAPER
That said, PwC noted that government regulation was deemed an important issue to consider by investors. Six-in-ten respondents named it as a key pressure point for businesses over concerns it was holding back AI adoption.
“The government has been clear that there needs to be a shift in the balance between risk and regulation," said Darren Ketteringham, Financial Services Leader at PwC UK.
"Creating an environment where the financial services sector is more dynamic, resilient, and competitive, will make the UK more attractive to international investment, and we saw evidence of this in PwC’s recent CEO Survey, which showed the UK is the second most attractive global destination for international investment.”
MORE FROM ITPRO
Freelance journalist Nicole Kobie first started writing for ITPro in 2007, with bylines in New Scientist, Wired, PC Pro and many more.
Nicole the author of a book about the history of technology, The Long History of the Future.
-
What is operational technology – and why is it at risk?
Explainer As operational technology becomes more connected, securing it from cyber threats is more urgent than ever
-
Databricks valuation jumps to $100 billion following Series K investment round
News The investment round marks the second in the space of a year for Databricks, bringing its valuation to over $100 billion - a 61% increase in the last two years.
-
Does Meta know where it's going with AI? Capex increases, talent poaching, and a fresh overhaul of its AI strategy suggest otherwise
Analysis Does Meta know where it's going with AI? Talent poaching, rabid investment, and now another rumored overhaul of its AI strategy suggests the tech giant is floundering.
-
Microsoft says these 10 jobs are at highest risk of being upended by AI – but experts say there's nothing to worry about yet
News Microsoft thinks AI is going to destroy jobs across a range of industries – while experts aren't fully convinced, maybe it's time to start preparing.
-
Workers view agents as ‘important teammates’ – but the prospect of an AI 'boss' is a step too far
News Workers are comfortable working alongside AI agents, according to research from Workday, but the prospect of having an AI 'boss' is a step too far.
-
OpenAI thought it hit a home run with GPT-5 – users weren't so keen
News It’s been a tough week for OpenAI after facing criticism from users and researchers
-
DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis thinks Meta's multi-billion dollar hiring spree shows it's scrambling to catch up in the AI race
News DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis thinks Meta's multi-billion dollar hiring spree is "rational" given the company's current position in the generative AI space.
-
Mistral's new sustainability tracker tool shows the impact AI has on the environment – and it makes for sober reading
News The training phase for Mistral's Large 2 model was equal to the yearly consumption of over 5,o00 French citizens.
-
VC investment in AI is skyrocketing – funding in the first half of 2025 was more than the whole of last year, says EY
News The average AI deal size is growing as VCs turn their attention to later-stage companies
-
The Replit vibe coding incident gives us a glimpse into why developers are still wary of AI coding assistants
News Recent vibe coding snafus highlight the risks of AI coding assistants