‘AI is no longer about experiments. It is about results’: Boards are pushing for faster returns on AI investments, and tech leaders can't keep pace
AI projects are now being held to the same standards as any other business investment
Business leaders are losing patience when it comes to AI investment, new research suggests, with many now expecting to see measurable returns within months, not years.
Software firm Emergn said its 2025 Global Intelligent Delusion Study shows that boards are no longer funding open-ended innovation; instead, AI is being judged like any other business investment, with timelines, margins, and outcomes under constant pressure.
The survey of CEOs, CTOs, COOs, and other senior leaders across the UK and US found that 34% said AI projects are taking longer than anticipated – often with pressure from boards to hit deadlines.
Nearly three-in-ten said AI has yet to live up to expectations, with 57% agreeing that organizational expectations for AI are growing faster than their ability to deliver. Just over half said they can't meet their AI goals without talent capable of problem framing, outcome design, and market integration.
However, 77% reckoned that new AI solutions will drive business value in the next 12 months and all expected ROI within two years.
Despite this, Emergn noted that without near-universal adoption and strategic alignment, execution is faltering. Leaders report slipping timelines, capability gaps, and mounting pressure to turn ambition into evidence.
“AI is no longer about experiments. It is about results,” said Alex Adamopoulos, chairman and CEO of Emergn.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2026 report - the leading resource for IT decision-maker insight on priorities and investment areas in AI, security and more.
"Leaders expect systems, capabilities and teams that can deliver measurable impact at scale. The winners will be the ones who turn AI into growth, with AI contribution margin as the new scoreboard."
The battle for ROI is heating up
The findings echo PwC’s recent Global CEO Survey, in which only one-in-eight CEOs said AI has delivered both cost and revenue benefits, with a third reporting gains in one or the other. More than half (56%) said they’d seen no significant financial benefit so far and 56% revealed the technology has delivered zero cost or revenue improvements.
A key factor behind poor success rates lies in preparation, PwC found. According to the survey, organizations that established strong AI foundations such as Responsible AI frameworks that enable enterprise-wide integration were three-times more likely to report meaningful financial returns.
Separate research from SAP does point toward positive gains on AI adoption, however. Analysis from the company found the average UK business is seeing a good ROI of 17% from AI.
Many said they were already starting to unlock value from the technology, with 36% reporting significant improvement in decision-making, 34% in customer engagement, and 31% in time to value.
Things are expected to improve moving forward, SAP added, with ROI forecast to almost double to 32% by 2027.
That doesn’t mean plain sailing, however. The study from SAP warned that a concerning number of AI programs are fragmented, with 42% of UK enterprises describing their investment as piecemeal.
Organizations need to stop treating AI as a ‘technology project’ and instead see it as a a holistic business transformation, the firm said.
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
You can also follow ITPro on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and BlueSky.
Emma Woollacott is a freelance journalist writing for publications including the BBC, Private Eye, Forbes, Raconteur and specialist technology titles.
-
AWS hits back at EU cloud 'gatekeeper' designation hintsNews Gatekeeper designation under the legislation would force AWS and Microsoft to make concessions
-
Is the Top500 meaningless? Not so, says US national laboratory CTOIn-depth LINPACK may measure only one process, but there are real and meaningful use cases for exascale systems
-
What are the minimum skills for AI use?We're all talking about AI but do we all have the right skills to maximize its potential in our roles, departments, and organizations?
-
Forget tokenomics – agents are a personnel costLooking at AI agents as an IT cost is to misunderstand what they are, says HPE chief
-
Sluggish AI returns ignored as ‘fear of missing out’ continues driving investmentNews Poor returns on investment aren’t stopping the sharp increase in AI investment
-
Dell raises annual forecasts as AI boom continues to reward hardware vendorsNews Supply chain adjustments and shrewd management of the memory chip shortage help Dell capitalize on increased demand for AI
-
Upskill your staff in AI or expect them to quit, says GartnerNews Organizations need to focus on targeted AI tools and training to make the most of their staff and succeed in transformation
-
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says these professions will be the big winners of the generative AI boomNews White collar workers might be sweating, but Jensen Huang thinks skilled tradespeople will be in the vanguard of the AI revolution
-
AI adoption projects keep failing, but enterprise ‘FOMO’ means investment is still risingNews More than half of organizations say they're only deploying AI because their competitors do
-
‘Today’s actions are not a cost-cutting exercise’: Cloudflare is cutting 1,100 jobs as internal AI usage surges 600%News The layoffs at Cloudflare come amid a 600% increase in internal AI usage
