AI isn’t making work easier, it’s intensifying it – researchers say teams are now facing 'unsustainable' workloads, cognitive strain, and higher levels of burnout
While workers report productivity gains with AI, that means they’re faced with bigger workloads
AI isn't going to make work easier, new research suggests, it’ll make it much more intense.
That's according to an ongoing study from a pair of researchers out of the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.
As part of the study, researchers followed the working habits of 200 workers at an American tech company for eight months, noting that they worked longer hours at a faster pace on a broader range of tasks once AI was introduced.
The company didn't require the employees to use AI, but did offer subscriptions to all staff.
"In our in-progress research, we discovered that AI tools didn't reduce work, they consistently intensified it," noted associate professor of management Aruna Ranganathan and researcher Xingqi Maggie Ye, per Harvard Business Review.
They admitted that "may sound like a dream come true" for managers and corporate leadership, the researchers also warned that the changes could be "unsustainable".
After the enjoyment of experimenting with the technology fades, workers risk burnout, workload creep, cognitive strain, and even weakened decision making — all of which not only risks eating away at productivity gains but could lead to lower quality work and increased turnover.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
The research comes as companies continue to wrangle with the impact of AI on their workforce, with a significant portion saying they are yet to see promised productivity gains.
Atlassian found developers were saving ten hours a week, for example, yet remained overworked due to organizational inefficiencies.
Separate research from Microsoft last year suggested the use of AI can lead to a reduction in problem solving and critical thinking, while Anthropic's own study shows AI may inhibit skills formation.
Intensification of work
The Berkeley researchers spotted three main challenges caused by work intensification: task expansion, blurred boundaries between work and home life, and increased multi-tasking.
AI enables task expansion by letting employees fill in gaps in their knowledge, enabling them to take on a wider range of work than previously possible – that included product managers writing code and researchers taking on engineering roles.
Notably, that helped staff expand their remits, which they found empowering, and benefited companies by reducing the need to bring in external help or boost headcount.
However, other workers across the enterprise felt a knock-on effect as a result. Software engineers, for example, had to review code created by AI-using colleagues who were "vibe coding" tools, which added to already-cumbersome workloads.
Beyond that, the researchers found the ease of using AI, and its tendency to be set to work in the background, meant "workers slipped small amounts of work into moments that had previously been breaks".
That included lunch, during meetings, or even in the evening after work, blurring the lines between work and rest, as well as leading to more multitasking.
"Many workers noted that they were doing more at once – and feeling more pressure – than before they used AI, even though the time savings from automation had ostensibly been meant to reduce such pressure," the researchers wrote.
To address that, the researchers advised companies to build in "intentional pauses", to ensure staff have a break, structuring work into coordinated batches to avoid constant notifications and overload, and including plenty of time for human workers to connect with their human colleagues.
Separate research suggests employees are happy to work with AI — but would rather not have the technology as a boss.
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
You can also follow ITPro on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and BlueSky.
Freelance journalist Nicole Kobie first started writing for ITPro in 2007, with bylines in New Scientist, Wired, PC Pro and many more.
Nicole the author of a book about the history of technology, The Long History of the Future.
-
‘Today’s actions are not a cost-cutting exercise’: Cloudflare is cutting 1,100 jobs as internal AI usage surges 600%News The layoffs at Cloudflare come amid a 600% increase in internal AI usage
-
The first hurdle is the hardest in generative AI adoption – and businesses keep fallingAnalysis AWS’ UK chief said AI advances “feel like magic” at its recent London summit, but many firms are facing the reality of sluggish gains
-
UK firms are grappling with mismatched AI productivity gains – employees are more efficient, but business performance is stagnatingNews AI is providing value at an individual level, but “systems and workflows” need to be redesigned for business-wide gains
-
Dynatrace eyes IT observability gains with Bindplane acquisitionNews The vendor said Bindplane’s integration will help customers gain greater control over telemetry data across distributed environments
-
‘AI isn’t replacing human talent’: UK tech workers are insulated from automation – at least for nowNews A survey from Hays shows only moderate exposure from AI on UK tech roles, including software developers and engineers
-
Enterprises need to stop shoehorning AI where it isn’t neededNews Successful AI deployments require clear use cases and “upfront preparation”
-
ROI is about more than profitability when it comes to AI adoption – here’s what enterprises are looking forNews A survey from KPMG suggests enterprises are measuring more than just financial returns
-
Enterprises are ‘paralyzed by a lack of understanding’ with AI adoption – and there's one key factor that decides successNews It's not the tech that's the problem, it's your business case, says Forrester


