AI isn’t making work easier, it’s intensifying it – researchers say teams are now facing 'unsustainable' workloads, cognitive strain, and higher levels of burnout
While workers report productivity gains with AI, that means they’re faced with bigger workloads
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
AI isn't going to make work easier, new research suggests, it’ll make it much more intense.
That's according to an ongoing study from a pair of researchers out of the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.
As part of the study, researchers followed the working habits of 200 workers at an American tech company for eight months, noting that they worked longer hours at a faster pace on a broader range of tasks once AI was introduced.
The company didn't require the employees to use AI, but did offer subscriptions to all staff.
"In our in-progress research, we discovered that AI tools didn't reduce work, they consistently intensified it," noted associate professor of management Aruna Ranganathan and researcher Xingqi Maggie Ye, per Harvard Business Review.
They admitted that "may sound like a dream come true" for managers and corporate leadership, the researchers also warned that the changes could be "unsustainable".
After the enjoyment of experimenting with the technology fades, workers risk burnout, workload creep, cognitive strain, and even weakened decision making — all of which not only risks eating away at productivity gains but could lead to lower quality work and increased turnover.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
The research comes as companies continue to wrangle with the impact of AI on their workforce, with a significant portion saying they are yet to see promised productivity gains.
Atlassian found developers were saving ten hours a week, for example, yet remained overworked due to organizational inefficiencies.
Separate research from Microsoft last year suggested the use of AI can lead to a reduction in problem solving and critical thinking, while Anthropic's own study shows AI may inhibit skills formation.
Intensification of work
The Berkeley researchers spotted three main challenges caused by work intensification: task expansion, blurred boundaries between work and home life, and increased multi-tasking.
AI enables task expansion by letting employees fill in gaps in their knowledge, enabling them to take on a wider range of work than previously possible – that included product managers writing code and researchers taking on engineering roles.
Notably, that helped staff expand their remits, which they found empowering, and benefited companies by reducing the need to bring in external help or boost headcount.
However, other workers across the enterprise felt a knock-on effect as a result. Software engineers, for example, had to review code created by AI-using colleagues who were "vibe coding" tools, which added to already-cumbersome workloads.
Beyond that, the researchers found the ease of using AI, and its tendency to be set to work in the background, meant "workers slipped small amounts of work into moments that had previously been breaks".
That included lunch, during meetings, or even in the evening after work, blurring the lines between work and rest, as well as leading to more multitasking.
"Many workers noted that they were doing more at once – and feeling more pressure – than before they used AI, even though the time savings from automation had ostensibly been meant to reduce such pressure," the researchers wrote.
To address that, the researchers advised companies to build in "intentional pauses", to ensure staff have a break, structuring work into coordinated batches to avoid constant notifications and overload, and including plenty of time for human workers to connect with their human colleagues.
Separate research suggests employees are happy to work with AI — but would rather not have the technology as a boss.
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
You can also follow ITPro on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and BlueSky.
Freelance journalist Nicole Kobie first started writing for ITPro in 2007, with bylines in New Scientist, Wired, PC Pro and many more.
Nicole the author of a book about the history of technology, The Long History of the Future.
-
Sovereign infrastructure spend to triple in Europe as fifth of workloads stay localNews Gartner says global spending on sovereign cloud infrastructure will climb 35% over the next year
-
Channel your innovation: Why IT partnerships are essential for the future of retailIndustry Insights A shared understanding and commitment to overcoming hurdles is key
-
Business leaders are using AI as a “license to reduce headcount” – new Morgan Stanley research lays bare the impact on UK workersNews Analysis of five sectors highlights an "early warning sign" of AI’s impact on jobs
-
Lloyds Banking Group wants to train every employee in AI by the end of this year – here's how it plans to do itNews The new AI Academy from Lloyds Banking Group looks to upskill staff, drive AI use, and improve customer service
-
CEOs are fed up with poor returns on investment from AI: Enterprises are struggling to even 'move beyond pilots' and 56% say the technology has delivered zero cost or revenue improvementsNews Most CEOs say they're struggling to turn AI investment into tangible returns and failing to move beyond exploratory projects
-
Companies continue to splash out on AI, despite disillusionment with the technologyNews Worldwide spending on AI will hit $2.5 trillion in 2026, according to Gartner, despite IT leaders wallowing in the "Trough of Disillusionment" – and spending will surge again next year.
-
A new study claims AI will destroy 10.4 million roles in the US by 2030, more than the number of jobs lost in the Great Recession – but analysts still insist there won’t be a ‘jobs apocalypse’News A frantic push to automate roles with AI could come back to haunt many enterprises, according to Forrester
-
Businesses aren't laying off staff because of AI, they're using it as an excuse to distract from 'weak demand or excessive hiring'News It's sexier to say AI caused redundancies than it is to admit the economy is bad or overhiring has happened
-
Lisa Su says AI is changing AMD’s hiring strategy – but not for the reason you might thinkNews AMD CEO Lisa Su has revealed AI is directly influencing recruitment practices at the chip maker but, unlike some tech firms, it’s led to increased headcount.
-
Accenture acquires Faculty, poaches CEO in bid to drive client AI adoptionNews The Faculty acquisition will help Accenture streamline AI adoption processes
