Engineering firms see little productivity benefit from use of AI
While there are benefits to AI, engineering firms aren’t capitalizing on the technology
Despite very high hopes, engineering firms are overwhelmingly failing to get much in the way of productivity gains from AI.
While 93% of engineering leaders expect AI to deliver productivity gains - and 30% anticipating very high gains - only 3% report achieving that level of impact.
However, according to the State of Engineering AI 2025 report from SimScale, organizations using cloud native simulation tools are twice as confident about achieving their AI goals within the next 12 months.
Notably, these firms are three times as likely to have mature AI programs, and six times as likely to have clean, centralized data.
"Engineering leaders see the potential of AI — but knowing isn’t doing,” said David Heiny, CEO at SimScale. “The challenge is no longer about believing in AI’s promise, but about overcoming the very real systemic blockers that stop teams from scaling it successfully.”
The biggest barriers, as with most industries, are siloed data and legacy tools, the study found. More than half (55%) cite siloed data and 42% legacy desktop computer aided engineering (CAE) tools as major blockers to their AI ambitions.
Meanwhile, 42% of CTOs complained about resistance to AI adoption within technical teams. However, engineering team leaders themselves reported resistance just 29% of the time.
This, SimScale noted, suggests that technical teams are more open, ready and motivated to adopt AI than leadership assumes.
AI as a growth driver in engineering
In terms of hopes, AI is seen as a growth driver, as well as a tool for more efficiency. Engineering leaders expect AI to fuel greater design innovation (54%), engineering productivity (51%), and faster time to market (47%). Reduced costs rank lowest on the list of expected benefits.
As for the lucky 3% who are seeing significant productivity gains, SimScale said it's all about project execution, with four key traits in common.
First and foremost, they have eliminated siloed, desktop-era toolchains in favor of cloud-native platforms, and their engineering data is centralized, accessible and structured, using open formats and APIs.
These companies also have integrated agentic workflows, building and integrating AI agents directly into live workflows — not as bolt-on tools, but as embedded decision-makers at the setup, evaluation, and optimization stages.
Similarly, successful deployers test in low-risk settings, but move quickly to real-world, in-the-loop deployment. This, the study noted, delivers value in weeks, not years.
“Forward thinking teams are proving that engineering AI can deliver significant changes in innovation and performance," said Jon Wilde, VP of Product at SimScale.
"The execution gap for others is not technical feasibility — it’s architectural and organizational readiness. Now it’s about helping those companies make that leap with confidence —before the gap becomes too wide to close."
Engineering firms aren't the only ones to find AI productivity gains turning out to be less than expected.
Research from workflow management platform Wrike earlier this year, for example, found that botched adoption strategies mean many UK enterprises are still facing critical inefficiencies and rising workloads.
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
MORE FROM ITPRO
-
The NCSC wants to build an AI-powered 'Cyber Shield' to protect the UK from hackersNews The aim is to create a national, sovereign defence capability to protect government agencies and critical infrastructure
-
IBM targets data center efficiency gains with new z17 and LinuxONE offeringsNews Cost, data center footprint, and performance improvements are coming for IBM Z and LinuxONE customers
-
AI projects are stalling at mid-market firms – Google Cloud and Accenture want to solve thatNews The new scheme aims to help mid-market companies move from pilot to production faster than ever before
-
FCA recommends expanded powers to boost financial services AI regulationNews The regulator has called for another review about whether AI needs to be regulated
-
UK business leaders have a 'limited understanding' of AI usage costs – and it's coming back to bite themNews Companies where CEOs are accountable for AI decisions report higher confidence in their strategy
-
What are the minimum skills for AI use?We're all talking about AI but do we all have the right skills to maximize its potential in our roles, departments, and organizations?
-
Forget tokenomics – agents are a personnel costLooking at AI agents as an IT cost is to misunderstand what they are, says HPE chief
-
Sluggish AI returns ignored as ‘fear of missing out’ continues driving investmentNews Poor returns on investment aren’t stopping the sharp increase in AI investment
-
Dell raises annual forecasts as AI boom continues to reward hardware vendorsNews Supply chain adjustments and shrewd management of the memory chip shortage help Dell capitalize on increased demand for AI
-
Upskill your staff in AI or expect them to quit, says GartnerNews Organizations need to focus on targeted AI tools and training to make the most of their staff and succeed in transformation
