Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's prediction about AI in software development is nowhere nearly to becoming a reality
Enterprises are using more AI-generated code, but Amodei's prediction of an industry-wide transformation hasn't yet materialized
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
In March this year, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei claimed AI would be writing 90% of code previously churned out by software developers within just six months.
“I think we’ll be there in three to six months – where AI is writing 90% of the code,” he said, per reports from Business Insider. “And then in 12 months, we may be in a world where AI is writing essentially all of the code.”
Amodei is by no means the first – or likely last – industry figure to tout the long-term potential of AI in software development. Indeed, the technology is taking the industry by storm, with developers and engineers adopting AI coding tools en masse.
However, having passed the six-month mark, Amodei’s bold prediction hasn’t quite come to fruition – but there are clear signs the technology is gaining traction on this front.
Naturally, gauging exactly how much code is written by AI across a range of industries would be extremely challenging. Big tech companies have been keen to highlight their own gains on this front, though.
In November 2024, Google CEO Sundar Pichai revealed more than 25% of the company’s internal source code was AI-generated. This has likely grown since then.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella one-upped his Google counterpart in April when he confirmed around 30% of the tech giant’s code was written by AI. Nadella’s comments came during a fireside chat with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg at LlamaCon.
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
“I’d say maybe 20%, 30% of the code that is inside of our repos today and some of our projects are probably all written by software,” Nadella told Zuckerberg at the time.
Big tech execs have developers sweating
It goes without saying that comments from big industry figures like Amodei et al have had software developers sweating in recent months.
Late last year, Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff suggested the company might not hire any software engineers due to the rise of agentic AI, while Zuckerberg told Joe Rogan he also believes AI will replace engineers.
Comments like these have prompted concerns over the future of the profession and sparked discussions about whether developers will one day be rendered obsolete by the technology they’ve helped build.
For entry-level developers fresh out of college, the situation appears even more concerning, according to Amodei. The Anthropic chief exec told Axios earlier this year the technology will severely impact entry-level roles across a variety of professions.
Don’t believe the hype on AI coding
There are two problems with these types of predictions, however. First and foremost, developers of these solutions have a vested interest in hyping up their products – an issue we’ve highlighted repeatedly.
Secondly, much of the data out there at present doesn’t paint quite as dire a picture for developers as many would have you believe. Stack Overflow’s 2025 Developer Survey shows that practitioners are flocking to AI solutions and intend to ramp up their use of these tools in the year ahead.
Crucially, however, a significant number (46%) of developers “don’t trust the accuracy” of AI outputs and nearly two thirds (61.7%) revealed they have ethical and security-related concerns about AI-generated code.
Research from Fastly also shows that developers frequently find themselves manually fixing AI-generated code. The time spent carrying out fixes essentially offsets the time saved by using the tools, Fastly noted.
A similar study from Google itself even found many enterprises are concerned about AI-generated code quality, despite the company lauding its own gains on this front.
With this in mind, Amodei’s prediction on the scale of AI-generated code doesn’t quite add up yet. The aforementioned Google study did note that concerns over AI-generated code were dissipating, and alternative research does point to an influx of AI code – albeit on a scale far lower than what Amodei expected by this point.
Around 42% of developers admitted to having AI-filled codebases, according to recent analysis from Cloudsmith. Once again, trust and security concerns were major talking points.
Only 20% of developers said they trust AI-generated code “completely”, the study found.
Make sure to follow ITPro on Google News to keep tabs on all our latest news, analysis, and reviews.
MORE FROM ITPRO
- AI company Anthropic had to tell candidates to stop using AI when applying for jobs
- Anthropic’s new AI model could be a game changer for developers
- Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei lays out his vision of powerful AI — and explains why he sounds a tad pessimistic

Ross Kelly is ITPro's News & Analysis Editor, responsible for leading the brand's news output and in-depth reporting on the latest stories from across the business technology landscape. Ross was previously a Staff Writer, during which time he developed a keen interest in cyber security, business leadership, and emerging technologies.
He graduated from Edinburgh Napier University in 2016 with a BA (Hons) in Journalism, and joined ITPro in 2022 after four years working in technology conference research.
For news pitches, you can contact Ross at ross.kelly@futurenet.com, or on Twitter and LinkedIn.
-
Security experts weigh in on motivation behind Stryker cyber attackNews The attack on medical tech company Stryker has severely impacted operations globally
-
The rise of PhaaS: what businesses should knowIn-depth With phishing as a service (PhaaS) on the rise, which new kits should firms know about and how can leaders avoid being caught out?
-
Microsoft has a new AI poster child in Anthropic – and it’s about timeOpinion Microsoft is cosying up to Anthropic at a crucial time in the race to deliver on AI promises
-
Concerns are mounting over the cognitive impact of AI as workers report experiencing ‘brain fry’ – and it’s causing "increased employee errors, decision fatigue, and intention to quit"News Research from Boston Consulting Group backs earlier studies in highlighting the negative cognitive impact of AI at work
-
Anthropic's Claude Cowork tool is coming to Microsoft CopilotNews The new Copilot Cowork tool will be made available through a new Microsoft 365 tier at the end of March
-
Will AI hiring entrench gender bias?ITPro Podcast This International Women's Day, it's more important than ever to consider the inherent biases of training data
-
February rundown: SaaS-pocalypse now?ITPro Podcast Geopolitical uncertainty is intensifying public and private sector focus on true sovereign workloads
-
If you thought RTO battles were bad, wait until AI mandates start taking hold across the industryOpinion Forcing workers to adopt AI under the threat of poor performance reviews and losing out on promotions will only create friction
-
Sam Altman just said what everyone is thinking about AI layoffsNews AI layoff claims are overblown and increasingly used as an excuse for “traditional drivers” when implementing job cuts
-
Anthropic promises ‘Opus-level’ reasoning with new Claude Sonnet 4.6 model – and all at a far lower costNews The latest addition to the Claude family is explicitly intended to power AI agents, with pricing and capabilities designed to attract enterprise attention