Only 13% of firms are tracking their AI energy usage – here’s why that’s a problem
While firms are rushing to adopt AI, they're not keeping on top of the associated power costs


While business leaders say they're concerned about the power demands of AI within their organization, few are managing to monitor it properly.
Seven-in-ten business leaders say they're aware of the significant energy required to train or run AI models, and half are concerned about the energy and efficiency challenges this brings.
Yet despite this, just 13% are monitoring the power consumption of their AI systems.
Only six-in-ten acknowledge that energy efficiency will play a crucial role in future strategic planning, thanks to both cost management imperatives and operational scalability concerns.
Rodrigo Liang, CEO of SambaNova Systems, said the study paints a stark picture of AI adoption, with firms rushing to embrace the technology while failing to manage its energy impact.
"Without a proactive approach to more efficient AI hardware and energy consumption, particularly in the face of increasing demand from AI workflows, we risk undermining the very progress AI promises to deliver,” Liang said.
“By 2027, my expectation is that more than 90% of leaders will be concerned about the power demands of AI and will monitor consumption as a KPI that corporate boards will track closely."
Sign up today and you will receive a free copy of our Future Focus 2025 report - the leading guidance on AI, cybersecurity and other IT challenges as per 700+ senior executives
Among those organizations that have widely deployed AI, more than three-quarters are actively seeking to reduce power usage. Popular approaches include hardware and software optimization, adopted by 40%, adopting energy-efficient processors (39.3%), and investing in renewable energy (34.9%).
For one-fifth of companies, rising power costs are a pressing issue, with 37% experiencing increasing stakeholder pressure to improve AI energy efficiency, and a further 42% expecting these demands to emerge soon.
However, while seven-in-ten leaders recognize the energy-intensive nature of training large language models (LLMs), only six-in-ten are aware of the significant power demands of inference.
This highlights a critical gap, researchers said, as inference workloads are set to dominate AI usage with the scaling of Agentic AI.
RELATED WHITEPAPER
Similarly, the excessive power consumption and prohibitive costs associated with current GPU-based solutions are likely to force many enterprises to seek more efficient alternatives.
This has the potential to fundamentally change the AI hardware landscape to favor solutions that deliver high performance without unsustainable energy demands.
"The rapid pace of AI adoption underscores a critical need for enterprises to align their strategies with the power requirements of AI deployment," said Liang. "As businesses integrate AI, addressing energy efficiency and infrastructure readiness will be essential for long-term success."
Late last year, the International Energy Agency (IEA) found that interactions with solutions like ChatGPT use ten-times more electricity than a standard Google search.
Training a large language model uses nearly 1,300MWh of electricity, the agency found - the annual consumption of about 130 US homes.
And if ChatGPT were integrated into the nine billion searches carried out each day, the electricity demand would increase by 10 terawatt-hours per year.
Emma Woollacott is a freelance journalist writing for publications including the BBC, Private Eye, Forbes, Raconteur and specialist technology titles.
-
Using DeepSeek at work is like ‘printing out and handing over your confidential information’
News Thinking of using DeepSeek at work? Think again. Cybersecurity experts have warned you're putting your enterprise at huge risk.
-
Can cyber group takedowns last?
ITPro Podcast Threat groups can recover from website takeovers or rebrand for new activity – but each successful sting provides researchers with valuable data
-
Microsoft says these 10 jobs are at highest risk of being upended by AI – but experts say there's nothing to worry about yet
News Microsoft thinks AI is going to destroy jobs across a range of industries – while experts aren't fully convinced, maybe it's time to start preparing.
-
Workers view agents as ‘important teammates’ – but the prospect of an AI 'boss' is a step too far
News Workers are comfortable working alongside AI agents, according to research from Workday, but the prospect of having an AI 'boss' is a step too far.
-
OpenAI thought it hit a home run with GPT-5 – users weren't so keen
News It’s been a tough week for OpenAI after facing criticism from users and researchers
-
DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis thinks Meta's multi-billion dollar hiring spree shows it's scrambling to catch up in the AI race
News DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis thinks Meta's multi-billion dollar hiring spree is "rational" given the company's current position in the generative AI space.
-
Mistral's new sustainability tracker tool shows the impact AI has on the environment – and it makes for sober reading
News The training phase for Mistral's Large 2 model was equal to the yearly consumption of over 5,o00 French citizens.
-
VC investment in AI is skyrocketing – funding in the first half of 2025 was more than the whole of last year, says EY
News The average AI deal size is growing as VCs turn their attention to later-stage companies
-
The Replit vibe coding incident gives us a glimpse into why developers are still wary of AI coding assistants
News Recent vibe coding snafus highlight the risks of AI coding assistants
-
Researchers tested over 100 leading AI models on coding tasks — nearly half produced glaring security flaws
News AI models large and small were found to introduce cross-site scripting errors and seriously struggle with secure Java generation