Work-life balance has become more important than pay when choosing or staying in a job, according to two new reports.
A recent survey by Randstad found that 83% of workers view flexible working options as their primary consideration ahead of job security and salaries.
Nearly half of the respondents said they had advocated for better working conditions, and a third said they'd actually left a job due to the lack of flexible work options.
"Many expected the challenging economic conditions of 2024 to temper talent expectations, but the Workmonitor shows the opposite has occurred," said Randstad CEO Sander van't Noordende.
"We have seen a new baseline established with talent continuing to hold multifaceted expectations."
Nearly three-quarters of workers said they'd be willing to take a cut in salary in return for a four-day work week, and 76% said they'd do the same for flexible working hours.
The report found that half of UK workers are now working flexibly, with most wanting to be in the office around three days a week and three-quarters saying they prefer hybrid work.
Notably, the report showed not all employers share the same views on the topic of flexible and hybrid working. Employers’ reasons for getting staff back into the office include improved collaboration and innovation and strengthening relationships between colleagues.
These three issues have been frequently cited by employers when implementing return to office mandates over the last year. Enterprises have also cited productivity improvements as a key motivation behind RTO mandates.
However, van't Noordende said employers need to be flexible if they're to keep the best staff.
"For today’s talent, the significance of work is complex and needs to be personalized. They are setting the terms on what truly matters to them as individuals and within their communities," he said.
"Successful businesses are those that will adapt and adjust to this new talent baseline. The solution lies in empowering our key resource: people."
Research from the University of Pittsburgh last year highlighted the risks of failing to offer flexible working, as well as the pitfalls of RTO mandates. The study found firms that implement strict working practices frequently experience ‘brain drain’, with many losing their most senior and experienced employees.
Workers are setting stricter boundaries
Ranstad’s study found employees are finding techniques to try and set stricter boundaries with their work.
These include clock blocking - blocking off times in their calendars to avoid meetings that could extend beyond their designated work hours.
Nearly six-in-ten millennials confess to doing this, along with 22% of Gen Z employees and 16% of Gen X workers.
Similarly, four-in-ten workers said they engage in coffee badging - starting their day with a few hours at the office before heading home to finish their work remotely.
Interestingly, 54% of those who have been caught doing it said their employers weren't bothered.
Workers aren't budging on flexible work
Ranstad’s recent findings correlate with similar research into flexible working arrangements. A study from the Global Payroll Association found that three-quarters of workers would turn down a job that didn’t offer hybrid or remote working options.
Most respondents even said they would prefer these options to a four-day week.
More than half reckoned they were more productive working from home, with 38% saying they were just as productive as they would be in the workplace.
Meanwhile, almost three-quarters said they were more likely to go ‘above and beyond’ for their employer while working remotely, perhaps committing to earlier starts or working later into the evening.
"It’s clear that a flexible working arrangement is now a key requirement in the eyes of many UK workers, so much so that no less than three quarters would now avoid applying for a role that didn’t offer some degree of flexibility," said GPA CEO and founder Melanie Pizzey.
"So whilst there may be a case to prove with respect to the impact remote working can have on productivity, it certainly seems that those firms who completely eradicate it from their professional offering could seriously reduce the talent pool on offer to them when it comes to hiring."
